Read President Kennedy's quote in the speech bubble from Citizenship.


How does this quote reinforce the author's purpose in the book?

A. It stresses the need for each citizen to take responsibility for his or her own well-being.
B. It introduces the idea of citizens giving back more to the community than they take.
C. It helps frame the idea that citizenship requires being actively involved in civic life.
D. It states the theme that citizens and great leaders need to work together.

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

loss of driver's license

Answer:i think the answer is A.its called negelect

Answer: A.It serves as a flashback to Hana's life in Japan before she left for America.

Explanation:

Hana was 21 girl who wanted to escape from the village in Japan where she lived and that is why she is describing at the beginning of the passage. She escaped from Japan to America and she traveled by boat, that is where she felt the smelling of the fish. Her life in America was not as she planned, she was hoping for the better but she married a man who was working as a farmer so she had to work with him.

Events in Miranda's life that remind her of the preciousness of life include reflecting on relationships and treating others with kindness, personal tragedies or challenges, and gratitude for the opportunity to live and be oneself despite adversity.

Throughout Miranda's life, there have been events that have reminded her of how precious life is. For example, when faced with the impending death of loved ones, she reflects on the importance of relationships and treating others with kindness. Additionally, Miranda might have experienced personal tragedies or challenges that made her appreciate the value of life.

The quote, 'Death is a great price to pay for a red rose,' reminds Miranda that life is precious and that love is more important. Furthermore, the quote, 'I only have six months to live. I am sad, angry, and scared, but more than any of these things, I am grateful...to live for at least a short time,' highlights the gratitude Miranda feels for the opportunity to live and be herself, even in the face of adversity.

Answer:

everything tastes like salt except salt

Answer:

everything tastes like salt except salt

Explanation:

Answer:

D. she wants to see if the carnival comes again.

Just answered it on USA Test Prep and got it right. (:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Stomp is a universally appealing art form because it uses rhythm and percussion in a dialogue-free performance, creatively utilizing everyday items for music. Its understandability and familiarity cross cultural and language barriers worldwide.

Stomp finds worldwide appeal due to its inclusive nature and universal elements. Stomp is a performance art form that involves percussion, movement, and visual comedy, abstaining from any use of spoken word or dialogue. It incorporates rhythm and percussion using everyday objects. This makes the performance understandable and familiar to all, regardless of language or cultural background. Moreover, its creative use of everyday items for music highlights an aspect of creativity and inventiveness that many find appealing.

https://brainly.com/question/32834923

#SPJ3

Although Macbeth has committed horrible crimes, he projects a heroic quality through courage, eloquence, and understanding.

Explanation:

COURAGE OF MACBETH

The courage of Macbeth is noticed very well in the end of the play. Macbeth is one of the greatest tragic hero who has nothing to go down unless he had it fighting. In Act V, Scene 7, Macbeth and himself is the only army against the enemy with victory. He was a capable  strong to be king in the rightful way if it wasn't for his mistakes and the fateful end.

ELOQUENCE OF MACBETH

Macbeth knew how to persuade others through his talk. Shakespeare works on linguistics is very visible in Macbeth's talk. To describe his ambition. Macbeth utilizes vaulting.

UNDERSTANDING OF MACBETH

Though the prophecy was sided towards Macbeth, there was slight anxiety from his side, he understood the consequences and what was going to happen. Throughout the play though there are few complications he understands the value of his crimes and that makes him a tragic hero.

Final answer:

Although Macbeth commits heinous acts, Shakespeare imbues him with heroic qualities like courage, eloquence, and understanding, which captivate the audience and add complexity to his character as a tragic hero.

Explanation:

Macbeth's Heroic Qualities

Despite Macbeth's terrible crimes in the play, Shakespeare does present him with certain heroic qualities that can elevate the audience's view of him. One of these qualities is his courage, initially presented in his valor in battle, making him deserving of being called 'brave Macbeth.' Later, even as Macbeth descends into tyranny, his willingness to face danger rather than flee shows a misguided but undeniable bravery.

Regarding eloquence, Macbeth is able to articulate his thoughts and feelings in a powerful way, creating a complex character whose soliloquies and dialogues captivate the audience. Whether he is expressing his ambition or his internal conflicts, Macbeth does so with language that draws empathy and awe, perhaps most famously in his 'Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow' speech upon learning of his wife's death.

Lastly, Macbeth does possess a certain understanding of the gravity of his actions, as seen in moments of self-reflection and awareness. His ability to comprehend the moral and psychological consequences of his deeds sets him apart from mere villains and aligns him with classic tragic heroes.

Answer:

The five parts include a strong introductory paragraph with a clear thesis, three body paragraphs substantiated with detailed evidence, and a compelling conclusion. Students should also use transitional words and phrases to guide readers through their arguments.

Explanation:

Answer:

Most written arguments that you fashion in your Davidson courses will include five parts: a claim, reasons in support of that claim, evidence your which those reasons rest, assumptions and core values upon which your claims and reasons hold true, and acknowledgment of alternative claims that have been or may be made.

Explanation:

Answer:

The first box:

C: Setting.

The second box:

D: Penthouse.

The third box:

C: Waterloo.

Explanation:

Please mark as BRAINLIEST.

Augustine was influenced by Neoplatonism in the construction of his theological ideas in Book XI of Confessions. He borrowed the concepts of 'The One' as the source of all things, the distinction between the immaterial and material world, and the soul's journey towards purification and return to God.

In Book XI of Confessions, Augustine was greatly influenced by Neoplatonism, a philosophy that merges Platonic ideas with religious and mystical elements. One of the main Neoplatonic concepts Augustine borrowed is the theory of Eternity, which he integrates into his Christian theology.

Neoplatonism propounded that all things originate from a single principle or source, often referenced as 'The One'. Augustine adapted this idea into his concept of God, seeing God as the ultimate source of all things. This also extends to the Neoplatonic view of the immaterial realm being superior to the material, which Augustine also incorporated into his thought—a clear distinction between the eternal God and the temporal world.

Further, the Neoplatonic idea of the soul's return to The One upon achieving purification can be found in Augustine's depiction of the soul's journey toward God. Augustine expressed these elements of Neoplatonism in his work, creatively synthesizing them with his own Christian beliefs.

https://brainly.com/question/4638337

#SPJ2

Answer:

allowance

Explanation:

Answer:

allowance

Explanation:

allowance122222222222222222222222222222222222222222222

Answer:

D

Explanation:

the end

hope it helps : )

C. Estella will never learn to love anyone

Explanation:

In the ending of 'Great Expectations', Estella never expressed her love for Pip. Even though she agreed not to be apart from Pip, there is no love expressed in her words. She felt guilty for what she did to Pip and asked for forgiveness.

The ambiguous ending of 'Great Expectations' hints at a continued relationship between Pip and Estella, possibly as friends.

The ending of Great Expectations by Charles Dickens is indeed somewhat ambiguous, but it suggests that Pip and Estella will remain friends or have some form of relationship moving forward. Though not explicit, the final lines hint at a mutual understanding and possibly a future together. Unlike options B, C, and D, the ending does not suggest a definite drifting apart, incapacity for love from Estella, or her causing Pip's downfall.

https://brainly.com/question/30458928

#SPJ12

Answer:

Sewall quotes Matthew 19:6 from the Bible to argue that all humans are equal in the eyes of God, hence slavery is immoral.

Explanation:

Sewall was a well documented abolitionists who unlike many argued, as evident in this passage, that all humans are equal. he does this using the biblical reference stating the same as well as the concept of Redemption.

By saying that the black people from Africa are redeemable, he urges the Christians to think of them in the same purview they think of their fellow man from. the possibility of redeeming the slaves with christian faith is presented by him as a way of elevating them from their plight. Using the Bible, he is also able to argue that the condition of the saves and the black people from Africa can be the fault of white people.

Final answer:

Sewall appeals to Christians by contending that the separation of families and the treatment of slaves are in direct conflict with the unity and dignity upheld by Christian values, using Biblical references to challenge the complicity in slavery.

Explanation:

Sewall appeals to Christians in the excerpt by highlighting the moral and ethical contradictions of slavery with Christian values, specifically the egregious acts of separating families akin to 'rending asunder' what God has joined. He invokes Biblical language and principles, associating the inhumanity of slavery with sin and immorality and questioning the complicity of Christians who benefit from slavery while their brethren suffer. Sewall's critique is grounded in a Christian ethos that values the unity of families and human dignity, challenging his contemporaries to reflect on the stark disparity between their professed beliefs and the brutal reality of slave trade practices.

Answer:

The correct answer is: grammar.

Explanation:

Grammar refers to the set of rules that are governing the language, that is, its composition, so we can say that each language has its own grammar.

Grammar is a part of linguistics, a general discipline that studies languages. Nowadays, grammar consists of phonology, morphology, and syntax, but it's also accompanied by phonetics, semantics, and pragmatics.

Answer:

The population in Lowell Massachusetts goes from 200 in 1820 to nearly 20,000 in 15 years  (1835).

Explanation:

This product allowed for the mass production of cotton, led to an increase in slavery, & pushed plantations west. The cotton gin.

Strong relationships never change of the following about relationships are not true. Therefore, option (c) is correct.

What is relationships?

The term relationship was to maintain of the person. The relationship was the measure of the one parties to the another parties. The relationship was the included of the two members. The friends and the family are the included of the relationship. The relationship was the necessary.

According to the given, the statement is to describe the meaning of the sentence are the not true. The strong relationship was to never change. There was the statement are the not, true. The relationship was the change are the main reason to the dynamics.

As a result, the strong relationships never change of the following statements about relationships are not true. Therefore, option (c) is correct.

Learn more about on relationships, here:

https://brainly.com/question/454875

#SPJ6

Final answer:

In scenario 1, it is important to choose the ethical option and take the found money to the lost-and-found. In scenario 2, cheating on a test by looking at your neighbor's answers is unethical. In scenario 3, changing grades as a TA is a violation of academic integrity.

Explanation:

In scenario 1, the moral dilemma is whether to keep the $100 bill or take it to the lost-and-found. While it may be tempting to pocket the money, it is important to choose the ethical option and take it to the lost-and-found. This is because keeping the money would be considered stealing, and it is our responsibility to return lost items to their rightful owners.

In scenario 2, looking at your neighbor's test answers when the teacher is not around is considered cheating. Cheating is an unfair advantage and goes against academic integrity. It is always best to do your own work and earn your grades honestly.

Scenario 3 involves changing grades on papers as a teacher's assistant. Even if you won't get caught, changing grades is unethical and goes against your responsibilities as a TA. It is important to maintain academic integrity by accurately representing the students' scores.

Answer:

Probably B

Explanation:

From the very beginning of the short story, Hemingway makes it clear that while Santiago may be old, he is not worn out. He refuses to let his age slow him down, or make him reliant upon others, when it comes to continuing his work as a fisherman. This determination to keep going, even when he knows it may be too much to handle, is Santiago's fatal flaw. He does not want to continually rely on others, even when he has experienced long streaks of bad luck. His desire to go further, and prove his abilities as a fisherman, ultimately put him at risk for a fatal end.

Answer:

This statement serves as an ethos, because through it the speaker affirms that he is a human being so integral and just that even God, who does not make mistakes, would testify in his favor.

Explanation:

This statement serves as an ethos, because through it the speaker affirms that he is a human being so integral and just that even God, who does not make mistakes, would testify in his favor.

Ethos can also designate the moral, social and affective characteristics that define the behavior of a certain person as correct and integral.

In rhetoric, ethos is one of the modes of persuasion or components of an argument, characterized by Aristotle. The ethos is the moral component, character or authority of the speaker to influence the audience. An example of this can be seen in the statement "I call God to witness ..." spoken by Creonte. Through this statement Creon tries to persuade the crowd by claiming that he is such an integral and honest man that even God would be a witness to his good behavior.

Final answer:

Creon's statement 'I call God to witness...' in 'Antigone' is an appeal to ethos, utilizing divine reference to establish credibility and demonstrate his alignment with the gods' will and the state's well-being. Creon's statement serves as ethos by invoking God as a witness in his speech, establishing credibility and moral authority.

Explanation:

In Antigone by Sophocles, Creon's statement, "I call God to witness..." serves as an appeal to ethos by emphasizing his commitment to the city and its values, as well as his allegiance to divine will. This declaration enhances Creon's credibility and moral authority, as invoking the gods was a powerful rhetorical strategy in ancient Greek culture. By swearing by the gods, Creon is attempting to position himself as a trustworthy and pious leader who aligns his policies with divine justice and the welfare of the state. His reliance on this appeal to ethos is intended to convince his audience of his legitimacy and the righteousness of his edicts regarding the treatment of Polynices.

The first paragraph of 'Lamb to the Slaughter' paints a serene picture of Mary Maloney's relationship with her husband, showing her as a devoted and loving wife awaiting his return, although the true nature of their marriage remains ambiguous.

The first paragraph of Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dahl creates an initial impression of Mary Maloney's relationship with her husband. It suggests a peaceful domestic scene where Mary is devoted and loving towards her husband. The atmosphere is one of calmness and affection, indicating a seemingly healthy and stable relationship. However, this tranquil setting may also serve to heighten the tension and dramatic irony as the story progresses, as the title itself foreshadows a turn towards the sinister. Mary’s attentive behavior as she waits for her husband, eagerly anticipating his return, reflects her deep care and commitment to their marriage.

It is important to note that the actual interactions between Mary and her husband are not detailed in this paragraph, leaving the true state of their relationship somewhat ambiguous. Dahl meticulously uses this calm before the storm to contrast with the eventual unfolding events and to draw the reader into a false sense of security about the nature of the Maloney’s marriage. The precise details of their relationship unfold as the story proceeds, revealing complexities and underlying tensions not immediately evident from the initial peaceful description.

Answer:

a united i think

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is D. Could

Explanation:

This is correct according to Study Island. Hope I helped you.

Answer:

You are running around the bases.

Explanation:

Final answer:

Option B, 'You are running around the bases,' is an example of the present progressive tense, which describes an action currently in progress.

Explanation:

The present progressive tense describes an action that is currently ongoing or happening right now. It is formed with the present tense of the verb 'to be' (am, is, are) followed by a present participle, which is the base form of the verb plus '-ing.' For example, 'She is running.' Taking this into account, the correct answer from the options provided is:

B. You are running around the bases.

This sentence uses the present tense of the verb 'to be' ('are') combined with the present participle of the verb 'to run' ('running'), fitting the definition of the present progressive tense. It indicates that the action of running around the bases is happening at this moment.

What caused the people of Poker Flat to be ‘after somebody’?

A) A citizen was in big trouble.

B) A citizen caused a fight in town.

C) Somebody had committed a murder and fled to the town of Poker Flat to escape capture.

D) The town had lost several thousand dollars, two valuable horses, and a prominent citizen.

The town had lost several thousand dollars, two valuable horses, and a prominent citizen.

Answer: Option D.

Explanation:

Poker Flat has a notoriety of being a somewhat uncivilized, ungovernable settlement where hoodlums, gamblers, and prostitutes frequent and make their living.

In any case, Poker Flat has as of late encountered a "spasm of virtuous reaction" in the wake of enduring the loss of a few thousand dollars, two significant steeds, and a noticeable resident.

Answer:

The students in Miss Caroline's class might be behind in their reading and writing, but they know their history. When Miss Caroline tells the children where she's from, they equate her with the County that stood with the Union and turned its back on their neighbors during the Civil War. The war between the states is still a sore spot in the South. Miss Caroline, and the way the children see her cid proof of those prejudices. Miss Caroline printed her name on the blackboard and said, “This says I am Miss Caroline Fisher. I am from North Alabama, from Winston County.” The class murmured apprehensively, should she prove to harbor her share of the peculiarities indigenous to that region. (When Alabama seceded from the Union on January 11, 1861, Winston County seceded from Alabama, and every child in Maycomb County knew it.) North Alabama was full of Liquor Interests, Big Mules, steel companies, Republicans, professors, and other persons of no background.

Explanation:

Answer:

"Annabel Lee and  "Remember" comparison and contrast, with the structures supporting the meaning of each poem, and including one stave from each poem to support the answer.​

Explanation:

The poem "Annabel Lee" by Edgar Allan Poe and "Remember" by Christina Rosseti are both poems talking about the contemplative and reconciliatory attitude towards the death of a beloved, expressed in a sad and dark mood.

The "Annable Lee"´s lines could be considered a ballad stanza form or a narrative poem to be recited or sung as the representation of the most pure form love, drawing a picture of eternal love, including elements in nature to state the innevitable separation between them as the sea, a looming, ominous presence symbolizing loneliness, coldness, and emptiness.

“Remember” is considered to be an iambic pentameter petrarchan sonnet whose tone changes with the break between the octave and the sestet, that brings a change in attitude, when the narrator gives up the need to be remembered, setting an irony as the poem´s name is “Remember” but, wishing her beloved happiness, even though he forgets her, as an expression of true love, using repetition to state the deepness between life and death, expressed with word like “gone away”,  “gone far away”, “silent land” rather than using elements in nature, symbolizing the narrator's loneliness and emptiness  without her beloved.

"Annabel Lee" by Edgar Allan Poe

A wind blew out of a cloud, chilling

  My beautiful Annabel Lee;

So that her highborn kinsmen came

  And bore her away from me,

To shut her up in a sepulchre

  In this kingdom by the sea.

Annabel Lee dies of frostbite on a cold night, and is put in a sepulchre, or tomb, which doesn't stop him from loving her.

"Remember" by Christina Rosseti

Remember me when I am gone away,

Gone far away into the silent land;

When you can no more hold me by the hand

Four words in this poem are used many times at the end of lines in this poem: me, we, sea, and Lee, other frequent rhyme words are "love" and "know", "chilling and killing" and "rise ... eyes". All these rhymes add a hypnotic quality to the poem.

The structures of 'Annabel Lee' and 'Remember' support the meaning of each poem in different ways. 'Annabel Lee' uses a ballad structure to emphasize the speaker's love, while 'Remember' employs a Shakespearean sonnet structure to reflect the formal tone of the poem.

In 'Annabel Lee', the poem is structured as a ballad with a repetitive rhyme scheme and a consistent rhythm. This structure adds to the nostalgic and rhythmic quality of the poem, emphasizing the speaker's deep love for Annabel Lee. In contrast, 'Remember' is structured as a Shakespearean sonnet, with fourteen lines and a specific rhyme scheme. This structure adds to the formal and controlled tone of the poem, reflecting the speaker's plea to be remembered after death.

'For the moon never beams without bringing me dreams
Of the beautiful Annabel Lee;'
These lines have a consistent rhyme scheme (AA, BB, CC, etc.) and a repetitive rhythm, emphasizing the speaker's deep attachment to Annabel Lee.

'Remember me when no more day by day
You tell me of our future that you planned:
Only remember me; you understand
It will be late to counsel then or pray.'
These lines follow the rhyme scheme of a Shakespearean sonnet (ABAB CDCD EFEF GG) and have a formal structure, reflecting the controlled tone of the poem.

https://brainly.com/question/31957651

#SPJ6

Roosevelt referred to realism or realistic in the context of the foreign policy of America during his tenure as the president of the country.

Explanation:

Theodore Roosevelt's foreign policy as president was animated by a desire to see the United States play a leading role in world affairs. He utilized skillful diplomacy, energetic executive action, and credible naval capabilities to support this forward role, while avoiding strategic over extension.

In Latin America, Roosevelt looked to forestall European intervention and secure U.S. predominance. In Europe and East Asia, he sought to promote regional balances of power, while working under strict constraints imposed by Congress and U.S. public opinion. In the end, Roosevelt navigated these constraints as well as international events with considerable success. His presidential tenure is a good example of American foreign policy realism in action.

The Roosevelt refer to a “realist” in paragraph 12 and to a “realistic American” in paragraph 17  :

Learn more :

https://brainly.com/question/13496529?referrer=searchResults