A physics demo launches a ball horizontally while dropping a second ball vertically at exactly the same time. Trajectories of two balls. The balls are initially placed at the same height above the ground. The first ball moves vertically downward, and hits the ground directly below the initial point. The second ball is launched horizontally, and follows a parabolic trajectory until it hits the ground at some horizontal distance from the initial point. Which ball hits the ground first?

Answer:

 y = 2,645 10⁴ / m²

m=80 kg,  y = 4.13 m

Explanation:

We must solve this problem in two parts, one when it is in free fall and another for the collision with the floor

Let's start by analyzing the crash with the floor,

Initial instant When it arrives but if you start to stop

              p₀ = m v

Final moment. When he stopped

              [tex]p_{f}[/tex] = 0

The momentum is related to the moment by

            I = Δp = p_{f} –p₀

            F t = 0 - mv

            v = -F t / m

Let's calculate

             v = -18000 0.040 / m

             v = -720 / m

The sign indicates that the speed goes down

Now we use energy conservation at two points

Lowest point. Just before crashing

               Em₀ = K = ½ m v²

Highest point. From where it began to fall

               Em_{f} = U = m g y

  Energy is conserved in the fall

               Em₀ = Em_{f}

                ½ m v² = m g y

                y = ½ v² / g

               y = ½ (720 / m)² /9.8

               y = 2,645 10⁴ / m²

For an explicit height value, the object's mass must be known, suppose the masses are m = 80 kg

              y = 2,645 10⁴/80²

              y = 4.13 m

To solve this problem we will apply the concepts related to electrostatic energy, defined as,

[tex]U_e = \frac{kq_1q_2}{d^2}[/tex]

Here,

k = Coulomb's constant

[tex]q_{1,2}[/tex] = Charge of each object (electron and proton, at this case the same)=

d = Distance

Replacing with our values we have that

[tex]U_e = \frac{(9*10^9Nm^2)(1.6*10^{-19}C)(-1.6*10^{-19}C)}{0.0539*10^{-9}m}[/tex]

[tex]U_e = -4.27*10^{-18}J[/tex]

Therefore for the Part A the answer is [tex]-4.27*10^{-18}J[/tex] and por the Part B the sign indicates that the force between the proton and electron is attractive

Answer:

.A. positive, positive.

Explanation:

When we throw a rock upward , it will decelerate due to gravitation . It will have acceleration in downward direction or - ve acceleration in upward direction.

If we define the ground as the origin and upward direction as positive , anything in upward direction will be positive and in downward direction will be negative . For example , in the case described above , acceleration of rock thrown upward is negative because is  in downward direction .

Its position is in upward direction , so its position is positive with respect to ground.

It is going in upward direction  . So velocity too will be positive.

Answer:

0.08 N/C

Explanation:

Electric Field: This is defined as the force per unit charge exerted at a point. The expression for electric field is given as,

E = Kq/r².............................. Equation 1

Where E = Electric Field, q = Charge, k = proportionality constant, r = distance.

making q the subject of the equation,

q = Er²/k............................... Equation 2

Given: E = 2 N/C, r = 4 m,

Substitute into equation 2

q = 2(4)²/k

q = 32/k C.

When r is increased to 20 m,

E = k(32/k)/20²

E = 32/400

E = 0.08 N/C.

Hence the electric Field = 0.08 N/C

The initial electric field from a charge is 2 N/C at 4m distance. When the distance increases fivefold, the strength of the electric field decreases by the square of this factor, resulting in a new electric field magnitude of 0.08 N/C.

This question is about the relationship between an electric field and its distance from a point charge. According to the formula for the magnitude of the electric field generated by a point charge, which is E = kQ / r^2, where E is the electric field strength, k is Coulomb's constant, Q is the charge, and r is the distance from the charge, the electric field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

At a distance of 4m, the electric field's magnitude is 2 N/C. If you increase the distance to 20m (which is 5 times more than the initial distance), the new electric field magnitude will be the initial magnitude divided by the square of this factor, i.e., 2 N/C divided by 5^2 = 2 N/C / 25, which equals to 0.08 N/C.

https://brainly.com/question/33547143

#SPJ3

Answer:

v = 0.2035 m/s

Explanation:

given,

Amplitude,A = 0.0127 m

Frequency, f = 2.55 Hz

maximum speed of the needle = ?

we know,

x = A cos ω t

velocity of the motion

v = - A ω sin ω t

for maximum speed

sin ω t = 1

v = - A ω

ω = 2 π f

now,

v =  A 2 π f

v = 0.0127 x 2 π x 2.55

v = 0.2035 m/s

Hence, the maximum speed of the needle is equal to 0.2035 m/s

Answer:

Range will become 4 times of initial range

Explanation:

Let the velocity of projection is u

And angle at which projectile is projected is [tex]\Theta[/tex]

And acceleration due to gravity is [tex]g\ m/sec^2[/tex]

So range of projectile is equal to [tex]R=\frac{u^2sin2\Theta }{g}[/tex]........eqn 1

Now in second case it is given that velocity of launching is doubled

So new velocity [tex]u_{new}=2u[/tex]

So new range will be equal to [tex]R_{new}=\frac{(2u)^2sin2\Theta }{g}=\frac{4u^2sin2\Theta }{g}[/tex] .....eqn 2

Now dividing eqn 2 by eqn 1

[tex]\frac{R_{new}}{R}=\frac{4u^2sin2\Theta }{g}\times \frac{g}{u^2sin2\Theta }[/tex]

[tex]R_{new}=4R[/tex]

So if we double the initial launch speed then range will become 4 times

Doubling the initial launch speed while keeping the launch angle fixed quadruples the range of a projectile due to the direct proportionality between the range and the square of the initial speed, considering factors like launch angle, gravity, and air resistance.

If you keep the launch angle fixed, but double the initial launch speed, the range of a projectile will increase. When the initial speed is doubled, the range increases four times because the range is directly proportional to the square of the initial speed. This phenomenon is influenced by factors such as launch angle, gravity, and air resistance.

Answer:

Explanation:

The electric field outside the sphere is given as,

E = k Q /r²

here Q = n x 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C

where n is the number of electons

if the dimeter of sphere d= 25 cm= 0.25 m

then the radius r = 0.125 m

we get

n= E r²/ k x 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C

n = 1350N/C x (0.125m)² / (8.99 x 10⁹ N m²/C² x 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C)

n = 14664731646

Answer:

a) 75.5 degree relative to the North in north-west direction

b) 309.84 km/h

Explanation:

a)If the pilot wants to fly due west while there's wind of 80km/h due south. The north-component of the airplane velocity relative to the air must be equal to the wind speed to the south, 80km/h in order to counter balance it

So the pilot should head to the West-North direction at an angle of

[tex]cos(\alpha) = 80/320 = 0.25[/tex]

[tex]\alpha = cos^{-1}(0.25) = 1.32 rad = 180\frac{1.32}{\pi} = 75.5^0[/tex] relative to the North-bound.

b) As the North component of the airplane velocity cancel out the wind south-bound speed. The speed of the plane over the ground would be the West component of the airplane velocity, which is

[tex]320sin(\alpha) = 320sin(75.5^0) = 309.84 km/h[/tex]

Answer:

a) Ф=14°, north of west

b) 310 km/h

Explanation:

we have,

[tex]v_{p/G}[/tex], velocity of plane relative to the ground(west)

[tex]v_{p/A}[/tex],velocity of plane relative to the air(320 km/h)

[tex]v_{A/G}[/tex],velocity of air relative to the ground(80 km/h, due south).

                 [tex]v_{p/G}[/tex]=[tex]v_{p/A}[/tex]+[tex]v_{A/G}[/tex].........(1)

a)     sin(Ф)=[tex]\frac{v_{A/G}}{v_{p/A}}[/tex]

                 =[tex]\frac{80km/h}{320km/h}[/tex]              

Ф=14°, north of west

b)    using Pythagorean theorem

[tex]v_{p/G}=\sqrt{v^2_{p/A}+v^2_{A/G}}[/tex]

[tex]v_{p/G}[/tex]=310 km/h

note:

diagram is attached

Explanation:

Exothermic reaction is defined as the reaction in which release of heat takes place. This also means that in an exothermic reaction, bond energies of reactants is less than the bond energies of products.

Hence, difference between the energies between the reactants and products releases as heat and therefore, enthalpy of the system will decrease.

Whereas in an endothermic reaction, heat is supplied from outside and absorbed by the reactant molecules. Hence, enthalpy of the system increases.

As water acts as a coolent and when fuel rods in a nuclear reactor are immersed in it then heat created by coolent is absorbed by water and then it changes into steam.

Since, absorption of heat occurs in the nuclear reactor. Therefore, it is an endothermic reaction.

Thus, we can conclude that nuclear reactors use fuel rods to heat water and generate steam. This process is endothermic.

Answer:

The heat produced by the nuclear reactor is an exothermic process while the heat absorbed by the water to convert into steam is an endothermic process.

Explanation:

Nuclear reactor being the heat of a nuclear power plant uses the radioactive uranium fuel to generate the heat by the process of nuclear fission in a controlled manner.

The processing of uranium is carried out into small ceramic pellets which are stacked together into sealed metal tubes known as fuel rods.

Usually more than 200 such rods are bunched together leading to the formation of a fuel assembly.

The core of the reactor is often made up of a couple hundred assemblies, according to its power level.

Inside the reactor vessel, these fuel rods are immersed into water which serve as both a coolant and moderator. The moderator helps slow down the neutrons produced by fission to sustain the chain reaction.

Answer:

f = 200[Hz]; L=1500[km]  

Explanation:

We know that frequency is the reciprocal of the period, therefore.

[tex]f=\frac{1}{T} \\f=1/0.005\\f=200[Hz][/tex]

And the wavelength is determined using the following equation.

[tex]L=\frac{c}{f} \\where:\\c = light speed = 3*10^{8}[m/s]\\ f = frecuency [Hz]\\L = wavelength [m]\\L= 3*10^{8}/ 200\\ L = 1500000[m] = 1500[km][/tex]

Final answer:

The frequency of a carrier wave with a period of 0.005 seconds is calculated to be 200 Hz. The wavelength cannot be determined without additional information on the wave's speed.

Explanation:

The question involves calculating the frequency and wavelength of a carrier wave given its period (T=0.005 seconds). The frequency (f) of a wave is the reciprocal of its period, defined by the equation f = 1/T. Therefore, for a period of 0.005 seconds, the frequency would be f = 1/0.005 Hz, which equals 200 Hz. To determine the wavelength (λ), we would need the speed (v) of the wave, which is typically the speed of light (c) for electromagnetic waves, but since the speed and specific type of wave are not provided, we can't calculate the wavelength directly from the given information here.

Answer

given,

diameter of telescope = 2 m

time to collect area = 1 hour

Diameter of the another telescope = 6 m

The light collected by the telescope is directly proportional to the area of its primary mirror.

Area of the mirror is directly proportional to the square of diameter.

so,

6 m diameter telescope will carry (6/2)² = 9 times more light than 2 m telescope.

Time taken to collect light = 60/9 = 6.67 minutes.

now, For 12 m telescope

12 m diameter telescope will carry (12/2)² = 36 times more time than 2 m telescope.

Time taken by 12 m telescope to collect light= 60/36 = 1.7 minutes.

To find the time required for a 6-m telescope and a 12-m telescope to perform the same task as a 2-m telescope, we can use a formula and rearrange it to solve for the time taken.

To find out how much time would be required for a 6-m telescope and a 12-m telescope to perform the same task as a 2-m telescope, we can use the formula:

(light collected by telescope 1) × (time taken by telescope 1) = (light collected by telescope 2) × (time taken by telescope 2)

Let's solve for the time taken by the 6-m telescope and the 12-m telescope:

By rearranging the equation and solving for the time, we can find the answer.

https://brainly.com/question/32814773

#SPJ3

Answer:

Because of Moment of inertia.

Explanation:

Larger wheels have larger moment of inertia,when they rotate rotational energy is stored in spinnning of motion so they rotate slowly while lighter wheels move faster comparitively because they use smaller moment of inertia.The thing is to keeping tyre in contact with road,when a vehicla hits a

jolt it is difficult with heavy tyre to be in contact with road. When vehicle loses contact the driver will lose steering control which result in giving a way to sliding friction.

Answer:

616.223684211 N

Explanation:

[tex]F_r[/tex] = Resistive force on the wheel = 115 N

F = Force acting on sprocket

[tex]r_2[/tex] = Radius of sprocket = 4.75 cm

[tex]r_1[/tex] = Radius of wheel = 25 cm

Moment of inertia is given by

[tex]I=mr_1^2\\\Rightarrow I=1.7\times 0.25^2\\\Rightarrow I=0.10625\ kgm^2[/tex]

Torque

[tex]\tau=I\alpha\\\Rightarrow \tau=0.10625\times 4.9\\\Rightarrow \tau=0.520625\ Nm[/tex]

Torque is given by

[tex]\tau=Fr_2-F_rr_1\\\Rightarrow F=\dfrac{\tau+F_rr_1}{r_2}\\\Rightarrow F=\dfrac{0.520625+115\times 0.25}{0.0475}\\\Rightarrow F=616.223684211\ N[/tex]

The force on the chain is 616.223684211 N

Explanation:

The visible light coming from celestial bodies from space are affected most by the atmosphere. The visible light suffer blurring and absorption.  So, to avoid such situation optical telescopes are kept in mountains where atmosphere is thin.

Whereas radio signal are not affected by the atmosphere so, they need not be placed in mountains.However, it is affected by various noises from the man made devices. So, to avoid these noises radio telescopes are kept in deep valleys.

Final answer:

Optical telescopes are placed on mountains to minimize atmospheric interference, reduce light pollution, and capture clearer images, while radio telescopes are located in valleys to shield them from man-made radio interference for clearer radio signal observations.

Explanation:

Optical astronomers often put their telescopes at the tops of mountains because these locations offer several advantages that are critical for observing the cosmos. Sir Isaac Newton mentioned that a serene and quiet air, often found on the tops of high mountains, is beneficial for reducing the confusion of rays caused by the atmosphere's tremors. This is echoed by modern practices where observatories are located in high, dry, and dark sites to minimize atmospheric interference, reduce light pollution, and avoid water vapor which absorbs infrared light.

The Andes Mountains in Chile, the desert peaks of Arizona, and the summit of Maunakea in Hawaii are examples of such ideal locations. On the other hand, radio astronomers sometimes place their telescopes in deep valleys to shield them from radio interference from human-made sources such as cell phones and electrical circuits. The natural geography of valleys can act as a barrier against these disturbances, providing a clearer signal for radio observations.

Answer:

[tex]L=4.19*10^{-6}H[/tex]

Explanation:

The self-inductance of a solenoid is defined as:

[tex]L=\frac{\mu N^2A}{l}[/tex]

Here [tex]\mu_0[/tex] is the the permeability of free space, N is the number of turns in the solenoid, A is the cross-sectional area os the solenoid and l its length. We replace the given values to get the self-inductance:

[tex]L=\frac{4\pi*10^{-7}\frac{T\cdot m}{A}(100)^2(1*10^{-4}m^2)}{30*10^{-2}m}\\L=4.19*10^{-6}H[/tex]

The self-inductance of the given solenoid would be approximately 1.395x10^-5 H. The calculation involved substituting known variables into the formula for self-inductance and solving.

The self-inductance of a solenoid can be calculated using the formula: L = µ₀n²A/l where L is the self-inductance, µ₀ is the permeability of free space, n is the number of turns per unit length, A is the cross-sectional area, and l is the length of the solenoid.

In this scenario, the cross-sectional area (A) = 1.00 × 10⁻⁴ m², length of the solenoid (l) = 30.0 cm = 0.3m, and the number of turns (n) = 100, so n (number of turns per unit length) = 100/0.3 = 333.33 turns/m. µ₀, the permeability of free space is a constant which is given as 4π × 10⁻⁷ T m/A. So, substituting these values into the formula will give:

L (self-inductance) = 4π × 10⁻⁷ T m/A * (333.33 /m)² * 1.00 × 10⁻⁴ m² / 0.3 m = 1.395x10^-5 H, (where H indicates henries, the unit for inductance)

https://brainly.com/question/40927173

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.00000103149529075 m²/s

0.0103149529075 stokes

Explanation:

A = [tex]2.4\times 10^-5[/tex]

B = 250 K

C = 140 K

T = 20°C

[tex]\rho[/tex] = Density of water = 998 kg/m³

Viscosity is given by

[tex]\mu=A\times 10^{\dfrac{B}{T-C}}\\\Rightarrow \mu=2.4\times 10^{-5}\times 10^{\dfrac{250}{273.15+20-140}}\\\Rightarrow \mu=0.00102943230017\ Pas[/tex]

Kinematic viscosity is given by

[tex]\nu=\dfrac{\mu}{\rho}\\\Rightarrow \nu=\dfrac{0.00102943230017}{998}\\\Rightarrow \nu=0.00000103149529075\ m^2/s[/tex]

The kinematic viscosity is 0.00000103149529075 m²/s

In BG units [tex]0.00000103149529075\times 10^4=0.0103149529075\ stokes[/tex]

In the SI system of units, the dynamic viscosity of water can be computed using the equation μ=A10B/(T-C). The dimensions of A are (m⋅s²)/kg. To find the kinematic viscosity of water at 20°C, we can use the formula ν=μ/ρ, where μ is the dynamic viscosity and ρ is the density of water. The kinematic viscosity of water at 20°C is approximately 0.0001 m²/s in SI units and 1 cm²/s in BG units.

(a) Dimensions of A:

To determine the dimensions of A, we need to rearrange the equation and analyze the units on both sides. We know that viscosity has units of kilograms per meter per second (kg/m/s). Plugging in the given values for B and C, we have μ=A10B/(T-C). The dimensions of 10B/(T-C) are (dimensionless). Therefore, the dimensions of A must be kg/m/s multiplied by the inverse of the dimensions of 10B/(T-C), which is 1/(kg/m/s) or (m⋅s²)/kg.

(b) Kinematic viscosity at 20°C:

To find the kinematic viscosity of water at 20°C, we can use the formula ν=μ/ρ, where μ is the dynamic viscosity and ρ is the density of water. The density of water at 20°C is approximately 998 kg/m³. Plugging in the given values for A and C, we can calculate μ using the equation μ=A10B/(T-C). Substituting the values into the formula ν=μ/ρ, we get ν≈μ/ρ≈(A10B/(T-C))/ρ.

In the SI unit, ν≈(2.4×10-5×10250 K/(293 K-140 K))/998 kg/m³≈0.0001 m²/s.

In the BG unit, ν≈0.0001 m²/s×104 cm²/1 m²≈1 cm²/s.

Answer: 7 kg bowling ball must move with a speed of 2.8 m/s so that it has the same kinetic energy.

Explanation:

Kinetic energy is the energy possessed by a body by virtue of its motion.

[tex]K.E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex]

m = mass of object

v= velocity of the object

[tex]K.E=\frac{1}{2}\times 6kg\times (3m/s)^2=27Joules[/tex]

b) for a 7 kg bowl to have kinetic energy of 27 Joules:

[tex]27J=\frac{1}{2}\times 7kg\times v^2[/tex]

[tex]v^2=7.7[/tex]

[tex]v=2.8m/s[/tex]

Thus 7 kg bowling ball must move with a speed of 2.8 m/s so that it has the same kinetic energy

Answer:

a) 8.58 m/s upward

b) -2.211 m/s downward

Explanation:

Let gravitational acceleration g = -9.81m/s2. This is negative because it deceleration the upward motion of the key.

(a)We have the following equation of motion

[tex]s = v_0t + gt^2/2[/tex]

where [tex]v_0[/tex] is the initial upward velocity of the keys, t = 1.1s is the time it takes for the keys to travel a distance of s = 3.5 m

[tex]3.5 = v_01.1 - 9.81*1.1^2/2[/tex]

[tex]3.5 = 1.1v_0 - 5.94 [/tex]

[tex]1.1v_0 = 3.5 + 5.94 = 9.44[/tex]

[tex]v_0 = 9.44 / 1.1 = 8.58 m/s[/tex]

So the keys were thrown initially upward with a speed of 8.58 m/s

(b) If the initial velocity of the key is 8.58 m/s and it is subjected to a deceleration of 9.81m/s2 for 1.1s then the velocity right at the 1.1s instant is

[tex]v = v_0 + gt = 8.58 - 9.81*1.1 = -2.211 m/s[/tex]

So they keys would have a downward speed of 2.211 m/s

Answer:

a) 2.063*10^-4

b) 1.75*10^-4

Explanation:

Given that: d= 1.628 mm = 1.628 x 10-3 I= 12 mA = 12.0 x 10-8 A The Cross-sectional area of the wire is:  

[tex]A=\frac{\pi }{4}d^{2} \\=\frac{\pi }{4}*(1.628*10^-3 m)^2\\=2.082*10^-6 m^2\\[/tex]

a) The Potential difference across a 2.00 in length of a 14-gauge copper  

   wire:

  L= 2.00 m

From Table  Copper Resistivity [tex]p[/tex]= 1.72 x 10-8 S1 • m The Resistance of the Copper wire is:

[tex]R=\frac{pL}{A}[/tex]

   =0.0165Ω

The Potential difference across the copper wire is:  

V=IR

 =2.063*10^-4

b) The Potential difference if the wire were made of Silver: From Table: Silver Resistivity p= 1.47 x 10-8 S1 • m

The Resistance of the Silver wire is:  

[tex]R=\frac{pL}{A}[/tex]

   =0.014Ω

The Potential difference across the Silver wire is:  

V=IR

 =1.75*10^-4

Answer : The volume of the second tank is, [tex]4ft^3[/tex]

Explanation :

Boyle's Law : It is defined as the pressure of the gas is inversely proportional to the volume of the gas at constant temperature and number of moles.

[tex]P\propto \frac{1}{V}[/tex]

or,

[tex]P_1V_1=P_2V_2[/tex]

where,

[tex]P_1[/tex] = initial pressure of gas = 2 atm

[tex]P_2[/tex] = final pressure of gas = 1 atm

[tex]V_1[/tex] = initial volume of gas = [tex]2ft^3[/tex]

[tex]V_2[/tex] = final volume of gas = ?

Now put all the given values in the above equation, we get:

[tex]2atm\times 2ft^3=1atm\times V_2[/tex]

[tex]V_2=4ft^3[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of the second tank is, [tex]4ft^3[/tex]

Incomplete question.The complete question is here

If the separation between the first and the second minima of a single-slit diffraction pattern is 6.0 mm, what is the distance between the screen and the slit? The light wavelength is 500 nm and the slit width is 0.16 mm.

Answer:

The distance between first and second minimum is 1.92m

Explanation:

Given data

Wavelength of light λ=500nm

Slit width D=0.16 mm

The distance between first and second minima is 6.0 mm

To find

Distance L between the screen and the slit

Solution

As we know that

Yn=(nλL)/D

Where is L is distance between the slit and screen

D is slit width

n is order of minimum

Yn is distance of nth minimum from center maximum

λ is wavelength of light

The Distance between first and second minimum is given as:

Y₂-Y₁=6 mm

(2λL)/D-(1λL)/D=6 mm

(2λL-1λL)/D=6 mm

(λL/D)=6 mm

[tex]L=\frac{6mm(0.16mm)}{500nm}\\ L=1.92m[/tex]

The distance between first and second minimum is 1.92m

Final answer:

The screen distance is 0.19 meters, calculated using the separation between minima, slit width, and light wavelength in single-slit diffraction.

Explanation:

Solve for the distance between the screen and the slit (L).

1. Given Values:

Separation between minima (Δx) = 6.0 mm (convert to meters: 0.0060 m)

Wavelength of light (λ) = 500 nm (convert to meters: 500 x 10⁻⁹ m)

Slit width (a) = 0.16 mm (convert to meters: 0.16 x 10⁻³ m)

2. Relate Separation and Screen Distance:

We can use the relationship between the angular separation (Δθ) and the linear separation (Δx) on the screen:

Δθ ≈ Δx / L

3. Relate Separation and Minimum Position:

We know the separation (Δθ) is related to the difference between the positions of the first (m = 1) and second (m = 2) minima:

Δθ = θ₂ - θ₁ = (λ / a)

4. Combine Equations:

Substitute the equation for Δθ from step 3 into the equation from step 2:

(λ / a) ≈ Δx / L

5. Solve for Screen Distance (L):

Now we can arrange the equation to solve for L:

L ≈ Δx * a / λ

6. Plug in the Values:

L ≈ (0.0060 m) * (0.16 x 10⁻³ m) / (500 x 10⁻⁹ m)

7. Calculate and Round:

L ≈ 0.192 m (round to two significant figures)

Therefore, the distance between the screen and the slit is approximately 0.19 meters.

Answer:

The excess charge on earth's surface was calculated to be 4.56 × 10⁵ C

Explanation:

Using the formula for an electric field;

E = kQ/r²

k = 1/(4πε₀) = 8.99 × 10⁹ Nm²/C²

E = 100N/C

r = radius of the earth = 6400 km = 6400000m

Q = Er²/k = 100 × (6400000)²/(8.99 × 10⁹)

Q = 455617.4 C = 4.56 × 10⁵ C

Hope this helps!!!

The excess charge on the surface of the earth is 4.55×10⁵C

To calculate the charge on the surface of the earth, we apply the equation of electric field strength, that is:

[tex]E = k\frac{Q}{r^2}[/tex]

here, E is the electric field strength = 100N/C (given)

k = 9×10⁹ Nm²/C²

Q is the charge, and

r = distance = radius of earth = 6.4×10⁶ m

Now,

[tex]Q = \frac{r^2E}{k}\\ \\=\frac{(6.4*10^6)^2*100}{9*10^9}\\\\Q=4.55*10^5 C[/tex] is the charge acquired on the surface of the earth.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/9774180?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

v = 7.5*10⁶ m/s

Explanation:

While accelerating through a potential difference of 160 V, the electron undergoes a change in the electric potential energy, as follows:

ΔUe = q*ΔV = (-e)*ΔV = (-1.6*10⁻¹⁹ C) * 160 V = -2.56*10⁻¹⁷ J (1)

Due to the principle of conservation of energy, in absence  of non-conservative forces, this change in potential energy must be equal to the change in kinetic energy, ΔK:

ΔK = Kf -K₀

As the electron accelerates from rest, K₀ =0.

⇒ΔK =Kf = [tex]\frac{1}{2}*me*vf^{2}[/tex] (2)

From (1) and (2):

ΔK = -ΔUe = 2.56*10⁻¹⁷ J = [tex]\frac{1}{2}*me*vf^{2}[/tex]

where me = mass of the electron = 9.1*10⁻³¹ kg.

Solving for vf:

[tex]vf =\sqrt{\frac{2*(2.56e-17J)}{9.1e-31kg} } =7.5e6 m/s[/tex]

⇒ vf = 7.5*10⁶ m/s

Final answer:

The speed of an electron after accelerating from rest through a potential difference of 160 V can be calculated using the conservation of energy principle, resulting in a velocity of approximately 5.93 × 10^6 m/s.

Explanation:

To calculate the speed of an electron after it accelerates from rest through a potential difference, we use the concept of conservation of energy where the electrical potential energy converted into kinetic energy is expressed as qAV = ½mv². Here, q is the charge of the electron (-1.60 × 10^-19 C), V is the potential difference (160 V), m is the mass of the electron (9.11 × 10^-13 kg), and v is the velocity of the electron we need to find. Rearranging the equation to solve for v and substituting the given values gives:

v = sqrt(2 × q × V / m) = √(2 × (-1.60 × 10^-19 C) × 160 V / (9.11 × 10^-13kg))

Performing the calculation yields a velocity of approximately 5.93 × 10^6 m/s.

Answer:

[tex]d=691.71km[/tex]

Explanation:

The time lag between the arrival of transverse waves and the arrival of the longitudinal waves is defined as:

[tex]t=\frac{d}{v_t}-\frac{d}{v_l}[/tex]

Here d is the distance at which the earthquake take place and [tex]v_t, v_l[/tex] is the velocity of the transverse waves and longitudinal waves respectively. Solving for d:

[tex]t=d(\frac{1}{v_t}-\frac{1}{v_l})\\d=\frac{t}{\frac{1}{v_t}-\frac{1}{v_l}}\\d=\frac{56.4s}{\frac{1}{5.05\frac{km}{s}}-\frac{1}{8.585\frac{km}{s}}}\\d=691.71km[/tex]

Answer:

Explanation:

Given

First capacitor magnitude [tex]C=1.75\ \mu F[/tex]

Second capacitor magnitude [tex]C=6.00\ \mu F[/tex]

Voltage of battery [tex]V=3.00\ V[/tex]

Both capacitor are connected in series so net capacitor is given by

[tex]\frac{1}{C_{net}}=\frac{1}{C_{1}}+\frac{1}{C_{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{C_{net}}=\frac{1}{1.75}+\frac{1}{6}[/tex]

[tex]C_{net}=\frac{6\times 1.75}{1.75+6}[/tex]

[tex]C_{net}=1.35\ \mu F[/tex]

So charge Across each capacitor is given by

[tex]Q=C_{net}\times V[/tex]

[tex]Q=1.35\times 10^{-6}\times 3[/tex]

[tex]Q=4.064\ \mu C[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]t=11.1s[/tex]

Explanation:

Given data

Jet Speed v=650 m/s=1.89504 mach

height h=4500 m

Speed of the Sound V=343 m/s

To find

time t

Solution

As we know that

[tex]Vs_{Velocity}=d_{distance} /t_{time} \\d=Vs*t[/tex]

where

[tex]Vs=1.895*V[/tex]

Also from trigonometric properties we know that

[tex]tan\alpha =\frac{Perpendicular}{Base}[/tex]

We have use height h as perpendicular and distance d is base

So

[tex]tan\alpha =h/d\\tan\alpha=h*(1/Vs*t)\\t=\frac{h}{tan\alpha } \frac{1}{Vs}\\[/tex]

First we need to angle α

Since

[tex]Sin\alpha =V/Vs[/tex]

[tex]Sin\alpha =\frac{v}{1.895v}\\\alpha =32^{o}[/tex]

Substitute given values and angle to  find

[tex]t=\frac{h}{tan\alpha } \frac{1}{Vs}\\t=\frac{4500m}{tan(32) } \frac{1}{1.895*343m/s}\\t=11.1s[/tex]

Final answer:

To calculate the time for a shock wave to reach an observer on the ground, divide the altitude of the jet by the speed of sound. For a jet at 4500 m and a sound speed of 343 m/s, it will take approximately 13.12 seconds for the shock wave to reach the ground.

Explanation:

The question pertains to the time it will take for the shock wave from a jet traveling at a constant speed and altitude to reach an observer on the ground.

To calculate this, one has to consider the speed of sound and the altitude of the jet from the ground. Using Pythagoras' theorem, one can determine the distance the sound has to travel to reach the observer. Then divide the distance by the speed of sound to find the time for the shock wave to reach the ground.

Let's denote the speed of sound as v and the altitude of the jet as h. The time t it takes for the shock wave to reach the observer can be calculated using the formula:

t = h / v

As given, the jet is flying at an altitude of 4500 m (4.5 km) and the speed of sound is generally taken to be 343 m/s. Plugging these values into the formula:

t = 4500 m / 343 m/s
t approx 13.12 seconds
Therefore, it will take approximately 13.12 seconds for the shock wave to reach the observer on the ground.

Answer:

t= 0.0003 mm

Explanation:

Given that

mass ,m = 230 mg

m  = 0.23 g

Area ,A= 23 x 17 cm²

A= 391  cm²

Density ,ρ = 19.32 g/cm³

Lets take thinness of the sheet =  t cm

We know that

Mass = Density x Volume

m = ρ A t

Now by putting the values in the above equation we get

0.23 = 19.32 x 391 x t

[tex]t=\dfrac{0.23}{19.32\times 391}\ cm[/tex]

t=0.000030 cm

t= 0.0003 mm

That is why the thickness of the sheet will be 0.0003 mm.

Answer:

451977.40113 N/C

Explanation:

[tex]\epsilon_0[/tex] = Permittivity of free space = [tex]8.85\times 10^{-12}\ F/m[/tex]

[tex]\sigma[/tex] = Surface charge density = [tex]4\ pc/mm^2[/tex]

Electric field near the surface of a charged conductor is given by

[tex]E=\dfrac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}\\\Rightarrow E=\dfrac{4\times 10^{-12}\times 10^{6}}{8.85\times 10^{-12}}\\\Rightarrow E=451977.40113\ N/C[/tex]

The electric field is 451977.40113 N/C

Answer:

(b) the point charge is moved outside the sphere

Explanation:

Gauss' Law states that the electric flux of a closed surface is equal to the enclosed charge divided by permittivity of the medium.

[tex]\int\vec{E}d\vec{a} = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}[/tex]

According to this law, any charge outside the surface has no effect at all. Therefore (a) is not correct.

If the point charge is moved off the center, the points on the surface close to the charge will have higher flux and the points further away from the charge will have lesser flux. But as a result, the total flux will not change, because the enclosed charge is the same.

Therefore, (c) and (d) is not correct, because the enclosed charge is unchanged.

Answer:

103.3°C

Explanation:

k = Thermal conductivity of stainless steel = 14 W/m² K

P = Power = 800 W

d = Diameter = 22 cm

t = Thickness of kettle = 2.2 mm

[tex]\Delta T[/tex] = Change in temperature = [tex](T_2-100)[/tex]

100°C boiling point of water

Power is given by

[tex]P=\dfrac{kA\Delta T}{t}\\\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{kA(T_2-T_1)}{t}\\\Rightarrow T_2=\dfrac{Pt}{kA}+T_1\\\Rightarrow T_2=\dfrac{800\times 2.2\times 10^{-3}}{14\times \dfrac{\pi}{4} 0.22^2}+100\\\Rightarrow T_2=103.3\ ^{\circ}C[/tex]

The temperature of the bottom of the surface 103.3°C

The temperature of the bottom surface of the kettle is approximately 1.593 Kelvin higher than the boiling water.

To calculate the temperature of the bottom surface of the kettle, we can use the formula for heat conduction: q = (k * A * ΔT) / t. Here, q is the heat transfer rate, k is the thermal conductivity of stainless steel, A is the surface area of the bottom of the kettle, ΔT is the temperature difference between the bottom surface of the kettle and the boiling water, and t is the thickness of the bottom of the kettle. Rearranging the formula, we can solve for ΔT as:

ΔT = (q * t) / (k * A)

Plugging in the given values, we find:

ΔT = (800 W * 0.0022 m) / (14 W/(m·K) * π * (0.22 m/2)²)

Calculating this, we find ΔT ≈ 1.593 K. Therefore, the temperature of the bottom surface of the kettle would be approximately 1.593 Kelvin higher than the boiling water.

https://brainly.com/question/14787338

#SPJ11