Answer:
b
Explanation:
In which poem is a specific diction used to convey the limited self-knowledge of the speakers?
Gwendolyn Brooks's "We Real Cool"
Robert Frost's "A Patch of Old Snow"
W.H. Auden's "Funeral Blues"
Marge Piercy's "Barbie Doll"
Answer:
Robert Frost
Explanation:
A patch of old snow
Answer: Gwendolyn Brooks's "We Real Cool"
Explanation: I got it right on my test.
Which sentence from the story "The Ransom of Red Chief" demonstrates irony only after reading the story's conclusion? A. "There was a town down there, as flat as a flannel-cake, and called Summit, of course." B. "Bill and me had a joint capital of about six hundred dollars, and we needed just two thousand dollars more to pull off a fraudulent town-lot scheme in Western Illinois with." C. "We selected for our victim the only child of a prominent citizen named Ebenezer Dorset." D. "Bill and me figured that Ebenezer would melt down for a ransom of two thousand dollars to a cent."
Answer:
D. "Bill and me figured that Ebenezer would melt down for a ransom of two thousand dollars to a cent."
Explanation:
In O. Henry's short story "The Ransom of Red Chief", Bill and Sam decide to kidnap the son of "an important citizen", Ebenezer Dorset, in order to gain $2000 needed for their fraudulent affairs.
But, their plan soon falls to pieces when they discover that they just can't handle the boy who is having fun with the kidnappers and keeps playing pranks on them.
Unable to control the boy's behaviour, Bill and Sam, lower the ransom, hoping that they will get rid of the boy sooner that way.
However, familiar with his son's character, restlessness and all the mischiefs he's capable of, Ebenezer makes a counterproposal to the kidnappers; he'll take the kid back if they pay him $250 for that.
This is the best example of irony in this story, since the kidnappers didn't get what they hoped for and even ended up losing some of their money.
Option D, 'Bill and me figured that Ebenezer would melt down for a ransom of two thousand dollars to a cent,' demonstrates irony after reading the story's conclusion.
Explanation:The sentence from 'The Ransom of Red Chief' that demonstrates irony only after reading the story's conclusion is option D: 'Bill and me figured that Ebenezer would melt down for a ransom of two thousand dollars to a cent.' This sentence is ironic because it turns out that the kidnapping plan did not go as expected, and Red Chief, the kidnap victim, actually causes so much trouble for Bill and the narrator that they end up paying a ransom to Red Chief's father just to get rid of him.
Learn more about Irony in 'The Ransom of Red Chief' here:https://brainly.com/question/35884927
#SPJ6
But soft! What light through yonder window breaks?/It is the East, and Juliet is the sun/Arise, fair sun, and kill the envious moon,/Who is already sick and pale with grief/That though her maid art far more fair than she./Be not her maid, since she is envious."
Answer:
This is an excerpt from Romeo and Juliet. Romeo compares Juliet to the sun. He means Juliet is just as beautiful as the sun, and hence the moon is Rosaline, but Juliet is much more beautiful and ends up making Romeo's anguish move away from Rosaline.
Answer:
This is an excerpt from Romeo and Juliet. Romeo compares Juliet to the sun. He means Juliet is just as beautiful as the sun, and hence the moon is Rosaline, but Juliet is much more beautiful and ends up making Romeo's anguish move away from Rosaline.
Explanation:
ME IS SMART
What represents the value of the second-best alternative that a person gives up when making a choice?
Amarginal spending
B. marginal benefit
C. opportunity cost
D. marginal cost
Which of the following terms is a fancy word for "what a word means"?
Tone
Connotation
Mood
Denotation
Answer:
Denotation
Explanation:
Dr. Alan Brinkley argues that history can be written in such a way that our history is fixed and unchanging, like this enormous granite statue of our Founding Fathers in Mount Rushmore National Monument, South Dakota. Is this, in fact, what Dr. Brinkley suggests about the job of the historian?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The southeastern face of Mount Rushmore in South Dakota’s Black Hills National Forest is the site of four gigantic carved sculptures depicting the faces of U.S. Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. Led by the sculptor Gutzon Borglum, work on the project began in 1927 and was finally completed in 1941. Over that time period, some 400 workers erected the sculpture under dangerous conditions, removing a total of 450,000 tons of rock in order to create the enormous carved heads, each of which reached a height of 60 feet (18 meters). In sculptor Gutzon Borglum’s original design, the four presidents were meant to be represented from the waist up, but insufficient funding brought the carving to a halt after completion of their faces. Known as the “Shrine of Democracy,” Mount Rushmore welcomes upwards of 2 million visitors every year, and is one of America’s most popular tourist attractions.
Dr. Alan Brinkley believes that history is not fixed and unchanging but must be continually re-examined to reflect new perspectives. This contrasts with the idea that history is akin to a static monument like Mount Rushmore. Reinterpreting history is essential for an accurate understanding of the past.
Dr. Alan Brinkley does not suggest that history should be fixed and unchanging like the enormous granite statue of our Founding Fathers at Mount Rushmore. Instead, Dr. Brinkley argues that history is subject to reinterpretation and needs to be re-examined continually to reflect new understandings and perspectives. This idea contrasts with the belief that history is like a static monument, unalterable and set in stone.
For example, the recent debates about removing statues of historical figures who held controversial views indicate that collective memory and historical interpretation are dynamic and evolve with societal values. Dr. Brinkley would argue that revisiting and possibly rewriting history is essential for a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the past.
How do the underlined words in the passage create meaning?
A. They describe how Pau Amma plays.
B. They describe how the animals play.
C. They describe Pau Amma’s impact on the sea and the animals.
D. They describe the tasks the Eldest Magician gives to the animals.
Answer:
C. They describe pau Amma's impact on the sea and the animals.
Explanation:
The underlined words in the passage are...
pour down, left bare, die, made muddy, drowned, flooded, filled with the salt water
Answer: c on edgunity
Explanation:
“Antigone:” Which of the following words best describes Antigone? a) Tender b) Defiant c) Frightened d) Considerate
Answer:
b) Defiant
According to my brain knowledge this is the correct answers
Final answer:
Antigone is best described as defiant in the play by Sophocles.
Explanation:
Antigone can best be described as defiant. In the play 'Antigone' by Sophocles, Antigone's act of burying her brother against King Creon's orders showcases her strong defiance of unjust laws. She stands up for what she believes is right, even in the face of severe consequences, ultimately choosing principles over authority.
100PPOINTSS
The story "the reader"
Imagine how the story might continue after Jorge enters the secret passageway using third-person point of view, write an ending to this story.
Jorge began walking away from his bedroom, away from his armchair and the comfort of his home. Each step took him farther into the dark and mysterious tunnel.....
Begin the story here.......
Please put setting, Dialogue, Charcteraziton, and a conclusion.
Please put at least 2-3 paragraphs.
Answer:Explain how the resolution of the play helps develop a theme related to secrets, fate, or love.
Sample Response: The resolution helps show the theme that fate, not free will, controls our destiny. Romeo and Juliet wanted to be together despite their families' feud, but the result was that they both died. We learn in the prologue that Romeo and Juliet's relationship was doomed from the start. Though the characters made decisions that led to the catastrophe, certain events were out of their control. Had Friar John not been quarantined because of the plague, the couple might still be alive. They were pawns of fate, and they were fated to die so that their families would stop feuding.
Sample Response: The resolution helps show the theme that fate, not free will, controls our destiny. Romeo and Juliet wanted to be together despite their families' feud, but the result was that they both died. We learn in the prologue that Romeo and Juliet's relationship was doomed from the start. Though the characters made decisions that led to the catastrophe, certain events were out of their control. Had Friar John not been quarantined because of the plague, the couple might still be alive. They were pawns of fate, and they were fated to die so that their families would stop feuding.
What did you include in your response? Check all that apply.
a topic
a conflict
a resolution to the conflict
an explanation of how the resolution develops a theme
Explanation:
Answer:
until he come to a stop. he saw something at the end of tunnel. its was tall and skinny. he decided to walk toward it to see what it was but it just seem to get farther every step he took. out of no where it disappeared no where to be seen. he was determined to figure out what it was so he ran towards the end of the tunnel. a bright light meet him there then everything went black. when he woke up, he was back in his bedroom. so he walked away from it again to find himself in the same tunnel with the same mysterious figure at the end of it. he started to sprint towards it and it disappeared again. then he was meet with a bright light again then everything went black. he woke back up in his bedroom and that's when he realized the tunnel he kept going through was were he died and to figure was death he got hit by a truck that's how he died. he was reliving his death for all eternity.
Explanation:
**20 POINTS*** NEED IT ASAP PLEASE (From USATestPrep)
How does the author use organization of ideas to achieve his purpose?
A) He lists different types of transportation that have affected the growth of the region in random order.
B) He traces the development of Native American myths and legends and their impact on the Sacramento Region.
C) He introduces each type of transportation in chronological order according to its importance and impact on the Sacramento Valley.
D) He arranges his information in an alphabetical sequence to show that transportation has had great impact on the Sacramento Valley.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
i just did the usa test prep
Tom’s testimony has the effect of making Scout feel sympathetic towards both Tom and Mayella. Explain why she is sympathetic towards each of them.
Answer:
Scout is sympathetic towards Tom because he was facing racial bias by the jury, whereas, Mayella was caught up in events and has to testify against Tom even when she does not like it. The jury was only interested in hearing that a black men has assaulted a white women. This scenario has made this trial offensive and unbiased for both of them.
Explanation:
Scout realizes that both Tom and Mayella are in awkward condition. Tom was vulnerable to racial discrimination and his defense was not taken seriously by the jury. On the other hand, Mayella was scared and had a hard life. She also do not intend to harm Tom Robinson. When Scout put herself in Mayella's shoes, she started noticing her fragility towards this trial, and how she suffers from her call of moral conscience within.
Tom’s testimony has the effect of making Scout feel sympathetic towards both Tom and Mayella. Scout is actually sympathetic towards Tom due to the fact that Tom was facing racial bias by the jury. Then Mayella testified against Tom due to the events that transpired.
About "To Kill A Mockingbird""To Kill A Mockingbird" is known to be novel written by Harper Lee. The story actually teaches about injustice, inequality, racism, etc. It shows we should judge people by their character.
Scout was actually sympathetic towards Tom due to the fact that Tom faced racial bias.
Learn more about "To Kill A Mockingbird" on https://brainly.com/question/1509680
The osprey was so upset with us that she threatened us. Swooping toward us repeatedly. What is wrong with the sentences above? A. "Swooping toward us repeatedly" is a sentence fragment. B. "The osprey was so upset with us that she threatened us" is a sentence fragment. C. "Swooping toward us repeatedly" is a run-on sentence. D. "The osprey was so upset with us that she threatened us" is a run-on sentence.
Answer: A
Explanation: The answer is A because the sentence is saying the osprey was threatening you but then it says swooping, this is a fragment. To not make it a fragment, you need to add a comma to the first sentence to complete it and to be a grammatically correct sentence.
The problem with the sentences is that 'Swooping toward us repeatedly' is a sentence fragment. It has no subject, and doesn't express a complete thought. It could be fixed by incorporating it into the first sentence.
Explanation:The issue with the sentences in question is option A: "Swooping toward us repeatedly" is a sentence fragment. A sentence fragment is a group of words that doesn't express a complete thought, which is what's happening in this case. The phrase "Swooping toward us repeatedly" lacks a subject doing the action, therefore, it cannot stand alone as a full sentence. A corrected version could be: "The osprey was so upset with us that she threatened us by swooping toward us repeatedly." In this version, the fragment is incorporated into the first sentence, creating a complete, cohesive thought.
Learn more about Sentence Fragment here:https://brainly.com/question/33010379
#SPJ2
How does Bartleby explain his refusal to preform certain tasks
A. He blames Turkey and Nipper for annoying him
B. He doesn’t
C. He becomes angry
D. He blames it on his work at the Dead Letter Office
Answer:
B
Explanation:
He doesn't explain but instead he goes with the phrase "I would prefer not to". That is what become his perpetual response to every request imposed on him. He continue with that habit as he does fewer and fewer task until non.
Chief Seattle contrasts the religions of the whites and of his people by saying the Native American religion exists "in the hearts of the people," while the religion of the whites is written on tablets of stone by:_______.
a. lightning atop a mountain.
b. an angry God.
c. moses.
d. seekers after truth.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The question is about the Chief Seattle speech: a Speech of the chief of the Duwamish people. In his speech, he says: "Your religion was written on tables of stone by the finger of iron of an angry God, so that you can forget about it. "So the correct answer is B. it also makes sense, since it is not Moses who wrote on the tables, but that he received the tables.
I have attached my essay for english! please can someone help me proof-read it?
If the letters; s,s,s,t,t,t,i,i,a,c are arranged in a random order what is the probability that they will spell statistics?
Answer:
1 10/3
1 7/3
1 4/2
1 2/1
1 1/1
Answer:
The answers are: 1 10/3, 1 7/3, 1 4/2, 1 2/1, 1 1/1
Explanation:
After a severe storm, the farmer noticed that a large tree had fallen near his field. However, the farmer and no others were present when the tree toppled over. Did the toppling of the tree make a sound?
Answer:
Yes and No! Yes, it makes a sound, that being a disturbance in the fluidic medium, air. When the tree falls it causes a disturbance in the air pressure field near his field and that pressure field emanates away from the fallen tree.
Reading the following statement
Many immigrants came to the United States with the hope
of improving their lives and making a better future for their
children.
Which type of rhetoric is being used to persuade the audience?
O
O
A. Moral
B. Logos
O
C. Ethos
O
D. Pathos
Answer:
The type of rhetoric is being used to Persuade the audience is Pathos
Explanation:
Pathos is a rhetorical device that uses words and topic that refer to emotional triggers that will cause the desired reaction coming from the audience, family is a very emotive topic and the way the sentence presents the idea of a person facing difficulties to give to their family everything that they need is an emotional movement of persuasion.
Final answer:
The statement about immigrants coming to the U.S. for a better life employs 'Pathos' by appealing to the audience's emotions, focusing on hope and aspirations for the next generation.
Explanation:
The statement 'Many immigrants came to the United States with the hope of improving their lives and making a better future for their children' uses Pathos as the type of rhetoric to persuade the audience. This rhetorical strategy appeals to the audience's emotions by emphasizing hope and the desire for a better future for one's children. Such language evokes emotions related to familial love, aspirations, and empathy, thereby making a strong emotional appeal to the audience.
In a multiple-clause sentence, what does the choice of tense for the verb in the subjunctive depend on?and when do you use the Present Past Subjunctive?
Answer:
depends on when the action takes place in each clause
Explanation:
The choice of tense in the subjunctive depends on the time frame of the action and the main clause's verb tense. The present subjunctive is used for current or habitual actions, while the past subjunctive is used for hypothetical or past contrary-to-fact situations. Tense consistency is important, and shifts in tense are used to signal chronological changes.
Explanation:The choice of tense for the verb in the subjunctive mainly depends on whether the action is seen as occurring presently or in the past, and partially on the main clause's verb tense. In English, the subjunctive mood is used for situations that are hypothetical, wishful, or not yet realized, and it is typically found in dependent clauses that follow words like 'wish', 'suggest', or 'if'. For instance, the present subjunctive is used for current actions or repeated actions, as in 'I suggest that he study more to pass the exam', while the past subjunctive is often used for hypothetical or contrary-to-fact situations in the past, as in 'If I were you, I would reconsider the decision'.
Tense consistency in a sentence is crucial, and when writing, you should generally stay within the chosen tense unless signaling a change in time. For instance, in narrative writing, you may choose past tense for traditional storytelling or present tense to create immediacy. However, the overall tense should remain consistent throughout the narrative, and shift only to clearly indicate a chronological change.
Verb mood is another aspect that influences the selection of verb tense. The subjunctive mood, indicative mood, and imperative mood each have different usages, with the subjunctive being used for hypothetical or non-real situations.
Learn more about Subjunctive Mood here:https://brainly.com/question/30359495
#SPJ12
What can one person do to defend the human rights of all people? (Can someone give me a few points im doing an informative essay and i need at least 3 points)
Protection of Human Rights.
Human Rights are the fundamental rights which every human being is entitled with regardless of their race, religion, caste, or sex. When it comes to protecting the human rights, it is a responsibility of every individual to defend it whenever needed. This can be done in the following ways:
• It is important that each person recognize the civil rights. They can’t take actions to defend the human rights if they’re not even aware of their basic civil rights which includes right to equality, life, liberty, and personal security.
• It is our duty to promote and protect the human rights. Every individual should create an environment where no one can hinder the basic rights.
• Take action and stand against injustice by being a part of local human rights activism or by signing a petition or by simply supporting the deserving party.
• If anywhere at anytime you find violation of human rights, it is your responsibility that you report it to the United Nation’s Sub Commission of Human Rights.
Final answer:
To defend human rights, one person can educate others, engage in political participation, and support human rights organizations. These actions contribute to raising awareness, influencing policy, and providing practical support to human rights causes.
Explanation:
One person can take significant steps to defend human rights for all people. Here are three points to include in an informative essay on this topic:
Education and Awareness: A fundamental step is to educate oneself and others about human rights, understanding which rights are inalienable, and raising awareness about issues of discrimination and rights violations. This involves learning about both civil liberties and civil rights and educating the public through discussions, workshops, and social media campaigns.
Political Participation: Engaging in the political process is crucial, including voting, contacting representatives, participating in peaceful protests, and even running for office, to advocate for policies and laws that protect human rights for all.
Support Organizations: Contributing to organizations that fight for human rights, whether through donations, volunteering, or advocacy, is a concrete way to help. This includes both nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and intergovernmental organizations that work on various aspects of human rights defense.
A popular storyline in romance movies, books, or TV is that the main character eventually falls in love with their next door neighbor, best friend, co-worker, etc. The reason is that this person was "there all along". Which type of romantic attraction is this storyline based on?
Answer:
The answer is "Proximity Attraction".
Explanation:
According to the theory that was proposed by Leon Festinger in the 1950's, the romantic attraction between two people can be explained by how close they are to each other physically. The more time people spend together or be in close proximity of each other, the more attracted they start to feel to the other person because of the constant exposure. The situations given in the question are examples to this attraction type which is the Proximity Attraction.
I hope this answer helps.
A general requirement for the informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. Exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. Which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language?
I waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation in this research.I waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation in this research. T/F
Answer:True, .I waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation in this research. This is an example of exculpatory langauge.
Explanation: Exculpatory language is a concept used to refer to how one party frees another party from being liable for anything that may happen to them due to an agreement and they waive the right of this other party.
It is a Latin word which means to remove guilt.
The whole incredible problem begins with the need to reinsert those events of 6 August 1945 back into living consciousness." As Berger describes and defines it?
Because Jacob was the best high school catcher in the city. What is the best way to add the dependent clause above to sentence 3? A. Jacob helped Will train every day for three months because Jacob was the best high school catcher in the city. B. Jacob helped because Jacob was the best high school catcher Will train every day for three months in the city. C. Because Jacob was the best high school catcher Jacob helped Will train every day in the city for three months. D. Because Jacob helped Will train every day for three months in the city Jacob was the best high school catcher.
The best way to add the dependent clause "Because Jacob was the best high school catcher in the city" to a sentence is option A: Jacob helped Will train every day for three months because Jacob was the best high school catcher in the city. This maintains logical flow and grammatical integrity.
Explanation:The question is about how to best incorporate a dependent clause into an existing sentence. The dependent clause in question is "Because Jacob was the best high school catcher in the city." To integrate this clause effectively, it must be placed in a way that maintains the clarity and grammatical integrity of the sentence. Among the given options, the correct choice would be:
A. Jacob helped Will train every day for three months because Jacob was the best high school catcher in the city.
This sentence structure correctly uses the dependent clause to provide the reason why Jacob helped Will train. The clause's placement at the end of the independent clause ensures that the sentence flows logically and is easy to understand.
Christopher is a mid-level manager who has been working with an executive coach to become a better leader within his organization. One of the goals has been to develop his emotional intelligence. Recently, he scheduled a meeting with a challenging objective – to inform his team of employees that the executive team has decided to abandon the project they've been working on. When he discusses the situation with the team, which of these approaches should he use to demonstrate emotional intelligence?
Answer:
When he discusses the situation with his team he should use empathy to demonstrate his emotional intelligence because the team at this stage need comfort and he needs to put himself in their position and try and explain to them that he understands their feeling and needs to assure them that it is not the end of the world that it might be for a greater reason.
Explanation:
Emotional Intelligence: this is also known as Emotional Quotient (EQ) this is the ability to understand and manage your own emotions in positive ways to relieve stress, empathize with others and overcome challenges.
Mick and Steve are two emerging adults living in Pittsburgh. According to the classification system of Lawrence Kohlberg, Mick's level of moral development is higher than Steve's. If Mick and Steve are the same age, what can we predict about Mick?
Answer:
Mick has a higher level of education than Steve
Explanation:
Kohlberg believes that there are six stages of moral reasoning that can be classified into three major levels. In the first level, which has the stage of obedience and punishment and also Individualism, Instrumentalism, and Exchange, they are found in elementary school level, while the second level of moral thinking, which is the conventional level is usually found in the society. This means that this concept is not dependent on age, but on the level of education.
Final answer:
Mick, having a higher level of moral development than Steve according to Lawrence Kohlberg's theory, is likely to make ethical decisions based on universal principles rather than on personal gain or societal norms. This suggests Mick has a more advanced understanding of morality, showing greater empathy and fairness.
Explanation:
If Mick's level of moral development is higher than Steve's according to Lawrence Kohlberg's classification system, we can predict that Mick operates at a higher stage of moral reasoning. Kohlberg's theory divides moral development into three levels: preconventional, conventional, and postconventional morality. Individuals who reason at the postconventional level, which is considered higher, make ethical decisions based on universal principles and the rights of all individuals rather than on personal gain or societal norms alone. This suggests that Mick is likely to consider broader ethical implications and justice principles when making decisions, showing a more advanced moral understanding.
Given that Mick and Steve are the same age, this development signifies that age is not the sole determinant of moral development levels. It implies a difference in the way Mick and Steve process moral dilemmas, with Mick potentially showing a greater capacity for empathy, fairness, and a nuanced understanding of right and wrong beyond immediate or conventional societal rules.
"In my speech I will demonstrate that there are clear parallels between the study of natural sciences and the study of humanities." This thesis sentence suggests which organizational patterns?
Answer:
comparative
Explanation:
A comparative organization pattern portrays information from the angle of how two or more things vary or are similar in their feature. This pattern is usually very effective when the person reading the paper has a great understanding of a subject when in comparison with another. From the example, the individual is trying to compare or contrast the study of natural sciences and that of humanities.
Martin Luther King Jr. Writes as a member of several communities, some overlapping, some in conflict. What are the communities? Focusing on two or three, explain how he defines himself within each.
Answer:
Civil Rights ActivistsBlack CommunityReligious Organizations (Pastor, President)Explanation:
Martin Luther King Jr, was a part of the Christian community but was not defined by it. he knew that the church was set on its ways and was resistant to change, and he critiziced them and urged them to revival.
A an activist he was hurt by the black community because of the criticism thrown against him and the disagreements.
Based on the information given, the communities include:
Civil Rights Activists.Black Community.Religious Organizations.It should be noted that Martin Luther King Jr, was a part of the Christian community. He was known as someone who preached equality and wanted peace.
He knew about the corruption in the church during his time, he criticized them and urged them to change. He was also an activist and he preached about treating blacks right.
Learn more about Martin Luther King on:
https://brainly.com/question/17746240
which evidence supports the inference that Nora is afraid of losing her relationship with her husband? 1) ""no idea what a dangerous condition he was in"" 2) ""how I cam to devise a way out of the difficulty"" 3) ""I had meant to let him in on the secret"" 4) ""It would upset our mutual relations altogether
Evidence that Nora is afraid of losing her relationship with her husband includes her secretive measures to save him, her plans to maintain secrecy, and her realization of their lack of genuine connection.
The evidence that supports the inference that Nora is afraid of losing her relationship with her husband includes her statement about devising a way out of the difficulty to save him without his knowledge, which shows her determination to protect him at any cost. Another piece of evidence is her contemplation of revealing her secret to her father and asking him to maintain that secret, suggesting her anxiety about the truth damaging her relationship with her husband. Finally, Nora's reaction to the idea of her husband assuming responsibility for her actions and her subsequent realization that they are strangers underscores her fear of losing the intimate connection they share.
Read this sentence from the text.
"He did not glance in my direction when I came in, causing my face to burn as I remembered him chastising me for being lazy and indifferent where the horses were concerned."
Why does Sophie say her face burned?
A. She was sunburned from spending so much time outdoors riding Prim.
B. She was angry that her father had done all of her chores and was mad at her.
C. She was embarrassed that her father appeared to be right about her indifference.
D. She was frustrated that her father would not look at her when she walked into the barn.
Answer: C- She was embarrassed that her father appeared to be right about her indifference.
Explanation: i don't know where this sentence came from but option C sounds like the logical reason because she said she was indifferent
Final answer:
Sophie's face burned as a symbolic representation of her embarrassment or shame, stemming from her realization of indifference towards responsibilities, as indicated by her father's previous admonishment.
Explanation:
The phrase "causing my face to burn" in the context of the sentence from the text signifies a strong emotional response. This reaction typically implies a feeling of embarrassment or shame rather than physical heat. In this scenario, Sophie's face burning is a metaphorical expression used to describe her embarrassment after recalling how she was chided for being lazy and indifferent towards the horses. Hence, the correct answer is C. She was embarrassed that her father appeared to be right about her indifference. This question highlights the importance of understanding figurative language and its use in conveying emotional states and character dynamics in literature.