A new drug to treat psoriasis has been developed and is in clinical testing. Assume that those individuals given the drug are examined before receiving the treatment and then again after receiving the treatment to determine if there was a change in their symptom status. If the initial results showed that 2.0% of individuals entered the study in remission, 77.0% of individuals entered the study with mild symptoms, 16.0% of individuals entered the study with moderate symptoms, and 5.0% entered the study with severe symptoms calculate and interpret a chi-squared test to determine if the drug was effective treating psoriasis given the information below from the final examination.

Final answer:

The hypothesis test to determine the mean annual premium in Pennsylvania compared to the national mean annual premium is H0: μ ≥ 1,503 and Ha: μ < 1,503. The point estimate of the difference between the mean annual premiums is -$78.

Explanation:

(a) To determine whether the mean annual premium in Pennsylvania is lower than the national mean annual premium, we need to develop a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis (H0) states that the mean annual premium in Pennsylvania is greater than or equal to the national mean annual premium. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that the mean annual premium in Pennsylvania is less than the national mean annual premium. Therefore, the correct answer is:

H0: μ ≥ 1,503
Ha: μ < 1,503

(b) The point estimate in dollars of the difference between the mean annual premium in Pennsylvania and the national mean is calculated by subtracting the national mean annual premium ($1,503) from the mean annual premium in Pennsylvania ($1,425). Therefore, the point estimate is $1,425 - $1,503 = -$78.

Answer:

(a) There are 70 different ways set up 4 computers out of 8.

(b) The probability that exactly three of the selected computers are desktops is 0.305.

(c) The probability that at least three of the selected computers are desktops is 0.401.

Step-by-step explanation:

Of the 9 new computers 4 are laptops and 5 are desktop.

Let X = a laptop is selected and Y = a desktop is selected.

The probability of selecting a laptop is = [tex]P(Laptop) = p_{X} = \frac{4}{9}[/tex]

The probability of selecting a desktop is = [tex]P(Desktop) = p_{Y} = \frac{5}{9}[/tex]

Then both X and Y follows Binomial distribution.

[tex]X\sim Bin(9, \frac{4}{9})\\ Y\sim Bin(9, \frac{5}{9})[/tex]

The probability function of a binomial distribution is:

[tex]P(U=k)={n\choose k}\times(p)^{k}\times (1-p)^{n-k}[/tex]

(a)

Combination is used to determine the number of ways to select k objects from n distinct objects without replacement.

It is denotes as: [tex]{n\choose k}=\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}[/tex]

In this case 4 computers are to selected of 8 to be set up. Since there cannot be replacement, i.e. we cannot set up one computer twice or thrice, use combinations to determine the number of ways to set up 4 computers of 8.

The number of ways to set up 4 computers of 8 is:

[tex]{8\choose 4}=\frac{8!}{4!(8-4)!}\\=\frac{8!}{4!\times 4!} \\=70[/tex]

Thus, there are 70 different ways set up 4 computers out of 8.

(b)

It is provided that 4 computers are randomly selected.

Compute the probability that exactly 3 of the 4 computers selected are desktops as follows:

[tex]P(Y=3)={4\choose 3}\times(\frac{5}{9})^{3}\times (1-\frac{5}{9})^{4-3}\\=4\times\frac{125}{729}\times\frac{4}{9}\\ =0.304832\\\approx0.305[/tex]

Thus, the probability that exactly three of the selected computers are desktops is 0.305.

(c)

Compute the probability that of the 4 computers selected at least 3 are desktops as follows:

[tex]P(Y\geq 3)=1-P(Y<3)\\=1-[P(Y=0)+P(Y=1)+P(Y=2)]\\=1-[({4\choose 0}\times(\frac{5}{9} )^{0}\times (1-\frac{5}{9} )^{4-0}+({4\choose 1}\times(\frac{5}{9} )^{1}\times (1-\frac{5}{9} )^{4-1}+({4\choose 2}\times(\frac{5}{9} )^{2}\times (1-\frac{5}{9} )^{4-2}]\\=1-0.59918\\=0.40082\\\approx0.401[/tex]

Thus, the probability that at least three of the selected computers are desktops is 0.401.

Answer:

Correct answer is option C i.e 28 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of students arriving at adviser's office per hour = x = 28

Number of students get approved = [tex]\frac{1}{2min}[/tex]  = 30/hour

    ∴ y = 30

Number of students on average on waiting =Lq

Lq = [tex]\frac{x^{2} }{y(y-x)}[/tex]

=  [tex]\frac{28^{2} }{30(30-28)}[/tex]

= 13.07

Average time student has to spend in

Waiting = Wq = [tex]\frac{x}{y(y-x)}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{28}{30(30-28)}[/tex]

= 0.466 hours

= 28 minutes

Answer:

The question is incomplete, below is the complete question,"There are two traffic lights on Darlene's route from home to work. Let E denote the event that Darlene must stop at the first light, and define the event F in a similar manner for the second light. Suppose that P(E) = 0.2, P(F) = 0.3, and P(E ∩ F) = 0.13.

a) What is the probability that the individual needn't stop at either light?

b) What is the probability that the individual must stop at exactly one of the two lights? c) What is the probability that the individual must stop just at the first light?"

Answer:

A. 0.63

B. 0.24

C. 0.07

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given,

P(E) = 0.2, P(F) = 0.3, and P(E ∩ F) = 0.13.

From the question, we can conclude that the event are dependent, hence

a. P(needn't stop at either light) = 1 - P(Need to stop at either light)

P(EUF)' =1-P(EUF)

P(EUF)' =1- (P(E)+P(F) -P(E ∩ F))

P(EUF)' =1-(0.2+0.3-0.13)

P(EUF)' =1-0.37

P(EUF)' =0.63

b. P(must stop at exactly one of the two lights) = P(must stop at either light) - P(must stop at both lights)

P(must stop at exactly one of the two lights)  = P(E u F) - P(En F)

but P(E u F)=0.37,

P(En F)=0.13,

P(must stop at exactly one of the two lights) = 0.37 - 0.13 = 0.24

c. P(must stop at just the first light) = P(must stop at either light) - P(must stop at the second light)

P(must stop at just the first light) = P(E u F)-P(F)

P(must stop at just the first light) = 0.37 - 0.3 = 0.07

The question deals with the topic of Probability in Mathematics. It presents the probabilities of two events, denoted as E and F, which are stopping at the first and second traffic lights, respectively. The question also provides the concurrent occurrence of both events.

The mathematics topic this question deals with is Probability. In the scenario given, E represents the event that Darlene must stop at the first traffic light and F represents the event that she needs to stop at the second traffic light. The probabilities of these events are given as P(E)=0.2 and P(F)=0.3, respectively. Additionally, we're given that the probability of both events happening (denoted P(E ∩ F)) is 0.13.

In order to analyze the situation, we can leverage the rule of joint probability, which states that the probability of two independent events both happening is the product of their individual probabilities. However, in this case the events E and F are not independent (since the probability of the intersection P(E ∩ F) is not equal to the product of probabilities P(E)*P(F)) so we know that the occurrence of E does influence the occurrence of F, and vice versa.

https://brainly.com/question/22962752

#SPJ3

Approximately 68.26% of the measurements fall between 46 and 74 in this distribution.

To find the proportion of measurements between 46 and 74 in a normal distribution with a mean (μ) of 60 and a standard deviation (σ) of 14, we can use the standard normal distribution (z-score) and the cumulative distribution function (CDF).

First, we need to convert the interval endpoints to z-scores using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Where x is the value in the interval, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For x = 46:

z₁ = (46 - 60) / 14

z₁ = -1

For x = 74:

z₂ = (74 - 60) / 14

z₂ = 1

Using the Excel functions:

=NORM.S.DIST(-1) and =NORM.S.DIST(1)

The probabilities are 0.1587 and 0.8413 respectively.

Now, we want the proportion of measurements between z₁ and z₂, which is:

Proportion = 0.8413 - 0.1587

                  ≈ 0.6826

To learn more about the z-score;

https://brainly.com/question/15016913

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Using the Empirical Rule for a normal distribution, approximately 68% of the measurements would fall between 46 and 74, as this range lies within one standard deviation above and below the mean of 60 in a distribution with a standard deviation of 14.

Explanation:

To find the proportion of measurements between 46 and 74 in a distribution with a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 14, we can use the Empirical Rule, assuming the distribution is normal (bell-shaped). This rule states that approximately 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% within two, and more than 99% within three.

In this case, 46 is one standard deviation below the mean (60 - 14), and 74 is one standard deviation above the mean (60 + 14). So, we would expect approximately 68% of the measurements to lie between 46 and 74.

This is because the data is likely to be distributed symmetrically around the mean in a normal distribution, and the range given includes measurements falling within one standard deviation from the mean.

So, the probabilities are: (a) 37/64, (b) 3/64, (c) 27/64, (d) 57/64

In each spin, there are four possible outcomes (nun, gimel, hei, shin), and each outcome is equally likely.

(a) Probability of getting at least one nun:

The probability of getting no nuns in a single spin is 3/4. So, the probability of getting no nuns in three spins is [tex](3/4)^3[/tex]. Therefore, the probability of getting at least one nun is 1 - [tex](3/4)^3[/tex].

Probability of getting at least one nun:

1 - [tex](3/4)^3[/tex] = [tex]1-\frac{27}{64}=\frac{37}{64}[/tex] = 0.58

(b) Probability of getting exactly 2 nuns:

The probability of getting a nun in a single spin is 1/4. So, the probability of getting exactly 1 hei in three spins is [tex]\left(\begin{array}{l}\frac{3}{1} \\\end{array}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^2[/tex].

= [tex]3 \times \frac{1}{16} \times \frac{3}{4}=\frac{3}{64}[/tex] = 0.05

(c) Probability of getting exactly 1 hei:

The probability of getting a hei in a single spin is 1/4. So, the probability of getting exactly 1 hei in three spins is [tex]\left(\begin{array}{l}\frac{3}{1} \\\end{array}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^2[/tex]

= [tex]3 \times \frac{1}{4} \times \frac{9}{16}=\frac{27}{64}[/tex] = 0.42

(d) Probability of getting at most 2 gimels:

The probability of getting 0 gimels is [tex](3/4)^3[/tex]. The probability of getting 1 gimel is [tex]\left(\begin{array}{l}\frac{3}{1} \\\end{array}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^2[/tex]. The probability of getting 2 gimels is [tex]\left(\begin{array}{l}\frac{3}{2} \\\end{array}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)^2\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)[/tex].

Add these probabilities to get the total probability.

[tex]\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^3+\left(\begin{array}{l}\frac{3}{1} \\\end{array}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^2+\left(\begin{array}{l}\frac{3}{2} \\\end{array}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)^2\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{27}{64}+\frac{27}{64}+\frac{3}{64}=\frac{57}{64}[/tex] = 0.9

​

Calculating probabilities of specific outcomes when spinning a dreidel multiple times.

Dreidel Probability Calculations:

Answer:

a) [tex] \bar X = \frac{2+2+1+3+1+0+4+1}{8}= 1.75[/tex]

b) The margin of error indicates we can be 95%confident that the sample mean falls within 0.89 of the population mean

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

The best point of estimate for the population mean is the sample mean given by:

[tex] \bar X = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}[/tex]

Since is an unbiased estimator [tex] E(\bar X) = \mu[/tex]

Data given: 2 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 0 , 4 , 1

So for this case the sample mean would be:

[tex] \bar X = \frac{2+2+1+3+1+0+4+1}{8}= 1.75[/tex]

Part b

Previous concepts

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

[tex]\bar X[/tex] represent the sample mean for the sample  

[tex]\mu[/tex] population mean (variable of interest)

s represent the sample standard deviation

n represent the sample size  

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

[tex]\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]   (1)

The margin of error is given by this formula:

[tex] ME=t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]    (2)

And for this case we know that ME =0.89 with a confidence of 95%

So then the limits for our confidence level are:

[tex] Lower= \bar X -ME= 1.75- 0.89=0.86[/tex]

[tex] Upperr= \bar X +ME= 1.75+0.89=2.64[/tex]

So then the best answer for this case would be:

The margin of error indicates we can be 95%confident that the sample mean falls within 0.89 of the population mean

Answer:

N = 6300 ways

She can choose the materials 6300 ways

Step-by-step explanation:

In this case order of selection is not important, so we use combination.

For solids,

She needs 2 out of 9 available solids = 9C2

For striped prints

She needs 4 out of 7 available = 7C4

For floral prints

She needs 4 out of 5 available = 5C4

The total number of ways she can choose the materials is;

N = 9C2 × 7C4 × 5C4

N = 9/(7!2!) × 7/(4!3!) × 5/(4!1!)

N = 6300 ways

To find the number of different ways Courtney can choose the materials for her quilt, we can use the concept of combinations. The total number of ways she can choose the materials is the product of the number of choices for each type of fabric.

To find the number of different ways Courtney can choose the materials for her quilt, we can use the concept of combinations. The total number of ways she can choose the materials is given by the product of the number of choices for each type of fabric. So, the answer is:

Total number of ways = number of ways to choose solids * number of ways to choose floral prints * number of ways to choose striped fabrics

Given that she needs 2 solids, 4 floral prints, and 4 striped fabrics, we can calculate:

Substituting these values into the formula:

Total number of ways = 36 * 5 * 35 = 6300

So, there are 6300 different ways Courtney can choose the materials for her quilt.

Answer:

Number of student = 25

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the number of student and y be the others

A new streaming service charges 5 dollars per month for students, and 10 dollars per month for everyone else

[tex]x+y=55\\y=55-x[/tex]

[tex]5x+10y=425[/tex]

replace y with 55-x

[tex]5x+10y=425\\5x+10(55-x)=425\\5x+550-10x=425\\-5x+550= 425[/tex]

Subtract 550 from both sides

[tex]-5x+550= 425\\-5x= -125\\x=25[/tex]

[tex]y=55-x\\y=55-25\\y=30\\[/tex]

Number of student = 25

Answer: 25 students used the service this month.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the number of students that used the streaming service this month.

Let y represent the number of people apart from students that used the streaming service this month.

This month, the service had 55 users. It means that

x + y = 55

The new streaming service charges 5 dollars per month for students, and 10 dollars per month for everyone else. They collected a total of 425 dollars. It means that

5x + 10y = 425 - - - - - - -1

Substituting x = 55 - y into equation 1, it becomes

5(55 - y) + 10y = 425

275 - 5y + 10y = 425

- 5y + 10y = 425 - 275

5y = 150

y = 150/5 = 30

x = 55 - y = 55 - 30

x = 25

The answer are (a) 169 (b) 341 (c) 125 (d) 87

A Venn diagram is an illustration that uses circles to show the commonalities and differences between things or groups of things.

Given that, A department store surveyed 428 shoppers, and the following information was obtained: 216 shoppers made a purchase, and 294 were satisfied with the service they received. If 47 of those who made a purchase were not satisfied with the service,

Refer to the Venn diagram attached.

The total number of shoppers surveyed is, N = 428.

Number of shoppers who made a purchase, n (P) = 216

Number of shoppers who were satisfied with the service they received,

n (S) = 294

Number of shoppers who made a purchase but were not satisfied with the service, n(S' ∩ P)  = 47

(a) The number of shoppers who made a purchase and were satisfied with the service = n(S ∩ P)

n(S ∩ P) = n(P)-n(S'∩P)

= 216 - 47 = 169

(b) The numbers of shoppers who made a purchase or were satisfied with the service = n (P ∪ S)

n (P ∪ S) = n(P)+n(S)-n(S∩P)

= 216+294-169

= 341              

(c) The numbers of shoppers who were satisfied with the service but did not make a purchase = n(S∩P')

= n(S)-n(S∩P)

= 241-169

= 125

(d) The number of shoppers who were not satisfied and did not make a purchase  = n(S'∩P')

= N-n (S ∪ P)

= 428-341

= 87

Hence, the answer are (a) 169 (b) 341 (c) 125 (d) 87

For more references on Venn diagram, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29301560

#SPJ5

a. 169 shoppers made a purchase and were satisfied with the service.

b. 341 shoppers made a purchase or were satisfied with the service.

c. 125 shoppers were satisfied with the service but did not make a purchase.

d. 381 shoppers were not satisfied and did not make a purchase.

Let's break down the information given:

Total shoppers surveyed = 428

Shoppers who made a purchase = 216

Shoppers satisfied with the service = 294

Shoppers who made a purchase and were not satisfied = 47

We are asked to find:

a. Shoppers who made a purchase and were satisfied with the service.

To find this, we subtract the shoppers who made a purchase and were not satisfied from the total shoppers who made a purchase:

216 − 47 = 169

b. Shoppers who made a purchase or were satisfied with the service.

To find this, we add the shoppers who made a purchase and the shoppers who were satisfied, but we need to be careful not to count the overlap twice (those who made a purchase and were satisfied):

216+294−169=341

c. Shoppers who were satisfied with the service but did not make a purchase.

To find this, we subtract the shoppers who made a purchase and were satisfied from the total shoppers who were satisfied:

294−169=125

d. Shoppers who were not satisfied and did not make a purchase.

To find this, we subtract the shoppers who made a purchase and were not satisfied from the total shoppers surveyed:

428−47=381

For such more question on shoppers

https://brainly.com/question/29744313

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{\bar d -0}{\frac{\sigma_d}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{-0.625 -0}{\frac{6.818}{\sqrt{8}}}=-0.259[/tex]

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-0.259) =0.796[/tex]

So the p value is higher than the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.01[/tex], then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference mean between after and before is equal to 0. So we can conclude that we don't have significant differences between the two populations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts  

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".  

Solution to the problem

Let's put some notation :

x=values popoulation 2 , y = values population 1

x: 64 69 83 60 66 84 60 81

y: 58 76 77 70 62 76 67 76

The system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_y- \mu_x = 0[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu_y -\mu_x \neq 0[/tex]

The first step is calculate the difference [tex]d_i=y_i-x_i[/tex] and we obtain this:

d: -6,7,-6,10,-4,-8, 7, -5

The second step is calculate the mean difference  

[tex]\bar d= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n d_i}{n}= \frac{-5}{8}=-0.625[/tex]

The third step would be calculate the standard deviation for the differences, and we got:

[tex]\sigma_d =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (d_i -\bar d)^2}{n} =6.818[/tex]

The 4 step is calculate the statistic given by :

[tex]z=\frac{\bar d -0}{\frac{\sigma_d}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{-0.625 -0}{\frac{6.818}{\sqrt{8}}}=-0.259[/tex]

Now we can calculate the p value, since we have a two tailed test the p value is given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-0.259) =0.796[/tex]

So the p value is higher than the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.01[/tex], then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference mean between after and before is equal to 0. So we can conclude that we don't have significant differences between the two populations.

Answer:

x

=

1

+

i

√

79

8

,

1

−

i

√

79

8

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the Last Diminisher method, in the first round, Anne gets her fair share because no one diminishes. In the second round, Doris is the only one who diminishes, thus gets her fair share. In the third round, despite Cindy and Ellen both diminishing, Ellen gets her fair share because she is later in turn order.

The Last Diminisher method is a fair division protocol used when a divisible good, like a cake in this example, needs to be divided amongst several players. This method removes discrepancies by having each player in turn reduce the piece until they don't want to diminish it further, and then giving that piece to the last to diminish.

In this case, Anne, Betty, Cindy, Doris, and Ellen are dividing the cake and playing in that order. In the first round, no one diminishes, so Anne gets her fair share of the cake. In the second round, Doris is the only one who diminishes, so she gets her fair share at the end of this round. In the third round, the last to diminish are Cindy and Ellen, but since Ellen is later in order, Ellen is the one who gets her fair share at the end of the round.

https://brainly.com/question/34867463

#SPJ3

Answer:

(a) Probability that a package is delivered by UPS if it weighs 2 lbs or more = 0.0316.

(b) Probability that a package is not delivered by UPS if it weighs 2 lbs or more = 0.9684 .

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that 20% of all packages from Amazon are delivered by UPS, from which 12% of the packages that are delivered by UPS weighs 2 lbs or more and 8% of the packages that are not delivered by UPS weighs less than 2 lbs.

Firstly Let A = Package from Amazon is delivered by UPS.

                B = Packages that are delivered by UPS weighs 2 lbs or more.

So, P(A) = 0.2  and P(A') = {Probability that package is not delivered by UPS}

                                P(A') = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8

P(B/A) = 0.12 {means Probability that package weight 2 lbs or more given it

                      is delivered by UPS}

P(B'/A') = 0.08 [means Probability that package weight less than 2 lbs given

                         it is not delivered by UPS}

Since, P(B/A) = [tex]\frac{P(A\bigcap B)}{P(A)}[/tex]   ,    [tex]P(A\bigcap B)[/tex] = P(B/A) * P(A) = 0.12 * 0.2 = 0.024 .

Also P(B) { Probability that package weight 2 lbs or more} is given by;

So, P(B) = [tex]P(B\bigcap A) + P(B\bigcap A')[/tex] = P(B/A) * P(A) + P(B/A') * P(A')

             = 0.12 * 0.2 + 0.92 * 0.8 { Here P(B/A') = 1 - P(B'/A') = 1 - 0.08 = 0.92}

             = 0.76

(a) Probability that a package is delivered by UPS if it weighs 2 lbs or more  is given by P(A/B);

  P(A/B) =   [tex]\frac{P(A\bigcap B)}{P(B)}[/tex] =  [tex]\frac{0.024}{0.76}[/tex] = 0.0316

(b) Probability that a package is not delivered by UPS if it weighs 2 lbs or more = 1 - P(A/B) = 1 - 0.0316 = 0.9684 .            

Answer:

0.2637

Step-by-step explanation:

We see from the question that the 5-card hand contains all 4 suits as shown below;

Number of cards = 52

Number of suits = 4

For the favorable cases therefore, we will choose two cards from the suit in which two cards are drawn. Then we will proceed to choose one card from each of the other suits.

4 suits will divide into 52 cards to give = (52 / 4) = 13 cards

Hence, the required probability;

[tex]= {\frac{4 *13c_2*13c_1*13c_1*13c_1}{52c_5}}\\= {\frac{2197}{8330}}\\= 0.2637[/tex]

Answer: the bill before 6% sales tax is $92.85

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the bill before the 6% sales tax.

It means that you paid 6% tax on x and the amount of tax paid would be

6/100 × x = 0.06 × x = 0.06x

Total amount that you paid for the meal including the 6% tax would be

x + 0.06x = 1.06x

If you spent $98.42 on the meal after the 6% tax, it means that

1.06x = 98.42

Dividing the left hand side and the right hand side of the equation by 1.06, it becomes

1.06x/1.06 = 98.42/1.06

x = $92.85

Answer:

116,280 ways

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of ways of assigning the accounts to each of the salesperson is computed by combination

Number of ways = n combination r = n!/(n-r)!r!

n = 21, r = 7

Number of ways = 21 combination 7 = 21!/(21-7)!7! = 21!/14!7! = 116,280 ways

Answer:

2√6 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Tan Ф = opposite/ adjacent

tan 60  = t / 2√2 ft

tan 60 = √3

t = (tan 60 )(2√2 ft)

t = (√3)(2√2 ft)  = 2√6 ft

Answer:

x = 368     production of country A (millions of (MT)

y = 215      production of country B (millions of (MT)

z =  93       production of country C (millions of (MT)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let call production as follows

Country A   production  x   millions on MT

Country B   production  y   millions on MT

Country C   production  z   millions on MT

Then according to problem statement

x  +  y  +  z   =  676        (1)

x = 60 +  y  + z

y = 122 + z

That system  ( 3 equations and three unknown varables ) could be solved by any of the available procedures.

By subtitution we get

x  =  60 + 122 + z + z     ⇒  x  =  182 + 2*z

And      

182 +  2*z  + 122 + z + z = 676

Solving for z

304  +  4*z  =  676     ⇒   4*z  =  676 - 304   ⇒   4*z  =  372

z  =  372/4       ⇒     z  =  93  millions of  (MT)

And

y  =  122 + z       ⇒  y  =  122 + 93       ⇒  y = 215  millions of (MT)

x  =  182  + 2*z    ⇒  x  =  182  + 2 ( 93)   ⇒ x  =  182 + 186

x = 368  millions of (MT)

We can cheked in equation 1

x = 368

y = 215

z =  93

Give a total of 676 millions of (MT)

Answer:

a) And if we replace we got: [tex]\bar X= 78[/tex]

[tex] s = 15.391[/tex]

b) [tex]78-3.25\frac{15.391}{\sqrt{10}}=62.182[/tex]    

[tex]78-3.25\frac{15.391}{\sqrt{10}}=93.818[/tex]    

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (62.182;93.818)    

Step-by-step explanation:

Dataset given: 109 67 58 76 65 80 96 86 71 72

Part a

For this case we can calculate the sample mean with the following formula:

[tex]\bar X = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}[/tex]

And if we replace we got: [tex]\bar X= 78[/tex]

And the deviation is given by:

[tex] s =\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\bar X)^2}{n-1}}[/tex]

And if we replace we got [tex] s = 15.391[/tex]

Part b

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

[tex]\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]   (1)

In order to calculate the critical value [tex]t_{\alpha/2}[/tex] we need to find first the degrees of freedom, given by:

[tex]df=n-1=10-1=9[/tex]

Since the Confidence is 0.99 or 99%, the value of [tex]\alpha=0.01[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.005[/tex], and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.005,9)".And we see that [tex]t_{\alpha/2}=3.25[/tex]

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):

[tex]78-3.25\frac{15.391}{\sqrt{10}}=62.182[/tex]    

[tex]78-3.25\frac{15.391}{\sqrt{10}}=93.818[/tex]    

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (62.182;93.818)    

We can take the square root of both sides, adding a plus/minus sign of the right hand side:

[tex]\sqrt{(y+150)^2}=\pm\sqrt{50}\iff y+150 = \pm\sqrt{50}[/tex]

Then, we subtract 150 from both sides:

[tex]y=\pm\sqrt{50}-150[/tex]

So, the two solutions are

[tex]y_1 = \sqrt{50}-150,\quad y_2 = -\sqrt{50}-150[/tex]

Answer:

No, the standard deviation for number of pages in a romance novel is six only.

Step-by-step explanation:

First we state our Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_o[/tex] : [tex]\sigma[/tex] = 6

             and Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_1[/tex] : [tex]\sigma[/tex] > 6

We have taken these hypothesis because we have to check whether our population standard deviation is higher than what editor hypothesized of 6 pages in a romance novel.

Now given sample standard deviation, s = 9 and sample size, n = 25

To test this we use Test Statistics = [tex]\frac{(n-1)s^{2} }{\sigma^{2} }[/tex] follows chi-square with (n-1) degree of freedom [[tex]\chi ^{2}_n__-1[/tex]]

       Test Statistics = [tex]\frac{(25-1)9^{2} }{6^{2} }[/tex] follows [tex]\chi ^{2}_2_4[/tex]  = 54

and since the level of significance is not stated in question so we assume it to be 5%.

Now Using chi-square table we observe at 5% level of significance the [tex]\chi ^{2}_2_4[/tex] will give value of 36.42 which means if our test statistics will fall below 36.42 we will reject null hypothesis.

Since our Test statistics is more than the critical value i.e.(54>36.42) so we have sufficient evidence to accept null hypothesis and conclude that our population standard deviation is not more than 6 pages which the editor hypothesized.

Answer:

12x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number be represented by x.

Then five times the number = 5*x

Seven times the number = 7*x

Sum of 5 times the number minus -2 = [tex]\[5*x - (-2)\][/tex] = [tex]\[5x +2\][/tex]

Adding seven times the number to this expression yields, [tex]\[5x+2+7x\][/tex]

[tex]\[= (5+7)x+2\][/tex]

[tex]\[= 12x+2\][/tex]

So the simplified expression corresponds to 12x + 2.

Option B:

[tex]I=1.0\times\ 10^{0} \ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex]

Solution:

Given sound level = 120 decibel

To find the intensity of a fire alarm:

[tex]$\beta=10\log\left(\frac{I}{I_0} \right)[/tex]

where [tex]I_0=1\times10^{-12}\ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex]

Step 1: First divide the decibel level by 10.

120 ÷ 10 = 12

Step 2: Use that value in the exponent of the ratio with base 10.

[tex]10^{12}[/tex]

Step 3: Use that power of twelve to find the intensity in Watts per square meter.

[tex]$10^{12}=\left(\frac{I}{I_0} \right)[/tex]

[tex]$10^{12}=\left(\frac{I}{1\times10^{-12}\ \text {watts}/ \text m^2} \right)[/tex]

Now, do the cross multiplication,

[tex]I=10^{12}\times1\times\ 10^{-12} \ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex]

[tex]I=1\times\ 10^{12-12} \ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex]

[tex]I=1\times\ 10^{0} \ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex]

[tex]I=1.0\times\ 10^{0} \ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex]

Option B is the correct answer.

Hence [tex]I=1.0\times\ 10^{0} \ \text {watts}/ \text m^2}[/tex].

Final answer:

To find the intensity of a sound at 120 dB, we use the formula SIL = 10 log(I / I0). With I0 as 10⁻¹² W/m², we find that I = 1.0 x 10⁰ W/m², corresponding to choice B.

Explanation:

To determine the intensity of a fire alarm that has a sound level of 120 decibels (dB), we use the relationship between sound intensity level and intensity in watts per meter squared (W/m²). The formula to convert decibel level to intensity is:

SIL = 10 log(I / I0)

Where SIL is the sound intensity level in decibels, I is the intensity of the sound, and I0 is the reference intensity, usually taken as 10⁻¹² W/m², the threshold of human hearing. To find the unknown intensity I, we can rearrange the formula:

I = I0 × 10(SIL/10)

For a sound level of 120 dB, the calculation would be:

I = 10⁻¹² W/m² × 10¹²⁰/¹⁰

I = 10⁻¹² W/m² × 10¹²

I = 1.0 × 10⁰ W/m²

Therefore, the correct answer is B. 1.0 x 10⁰ watts/m².

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Check attachment for solution

Answer:

(44/4)*30 = $330

Step-by-step explanation:

divide by four and multiply by 30

Answer:

Kelly will owe $1320.92 to the fabulous fence company.

Step-by-step explanation:

There is a cost related to the number of hours and a cost per feet. So the total cost is:

[tex]T = C_{h} + C_{f}[/tex]

In which [tex]C_{h}[/tex] is the cost related to the number of hours and [tex]C_{f}[/tex] is the cost related to the number of feet.

Cost per hour

Each hour costs $15.57.

They work for 6 hours total. So

[tex]C_{h} = 15.57*6 = 93.42[/tex]

Cost per feet

Each feet costs $3.25.

Kelly needs 350 feet. So

[tex]C_{f} = 350*3.25 = 1137.5[/tex]

The total cost is:

[tex]T = C_{h} + C_{f} = 93.42 + 1137.5 = 1230.92[/tex]

Kelly will owe $1320.92 to the fabulous fence company.

Answer: Vector b is not a linear combination

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all we put the vectors in terms of different variables, such as:

a1(1,-2,0)=(a,-2a,0);

a2(0,1,3)=(0,b,3b);

a3(6,-6,18)=(6c,-6c,18c);

To know that a vector is a linear combination we need to express it like a sum of other different vectors.

(2,-2,6)=(a,-2a,0)+(0,b,3b)+(6c,-6c,18c)

(2,-2,6)=(a+0+6c,-2a+b-6c,0+3b+18c)

We express this sum like a system of equations.

a+6c=2

-2a+b-6c=-2

3b+18c=6

We solve this system of equations and we can note that the system don't have a solution, so the vector b is not a linear combination of a1, a2, and a3.

Upon forming a system of linear equations and solving, a solution would imply that vector b is indeed a linear combination of vectors a1, a2, and a3. The observed placement of pivots in the corresponding echelon matrix backs this conclusion.

In this question, you are asked to determine if vector b is a linear combination of vectors a1, a2, and a3. A vector is a linear combination of others if it can be written as a weighed sum of those vectors. To solve this problem, we need to form a system of linear equations based on the vectors and solve this system. If all of the coefficients can be expressed as real numbers, it means that the vector b is a linear combination of a1, a2, and a3.

In this case, our system of equations looks like this:

x∗a1 + y∗a2 + z∗a3 = b

In matrix form it can be written as:

|1 0 6|x| = |2|, |-2 1 -6|y| = |-2|, |0 3 18|z| = |6|.

Solve this system through methods like Gauss-Jordan elimination or row reduction. The pivots in the corresponding echelon matrix should be in the first entry in the first column, the second entry in the second column, and the third entry in the third column.

This suggests that vector b can indeed be a linear combination of vectors a1, a2, and a3.

https://brainly.com/question/38007930

#SPJ11

Answer:

Are the events A and B disjoint? Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Disjoint events are those events that cannot occur at the same time, i.e. for events X and Y to be disjoint, [tex]P(X\cap Y)=0[/tex].

The event A is defined as the number of students whose age is at most 32.

And event B is defined as the number of students whose age is at least 37.

The events A and B are disjoint events.

The sample space for the intersection of these two events is:

Sample space of (A ∩ B) = 0

As there are no common terms in both the sample.

Hence proved, events A and B are disjoint.